“embarrassment and reputational harm” why is this even a valid argument. We can't show the bad way we run things as it would embarrass us and harm are reputation by making it accurate.
this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
180 points (100.0% liked)
politics
29031 readers
1745 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Acute accountability allergy.
I hope these videos follow them for the rest of their lives. Especially that bit where Justin Fox called a holocaust documentary "inheritly discriminatory" because it focused on "females" and "Jewish people". 54:10 in this video: https://youtube.com/watch?v=TZheRo273ns
Oh, and the part where he said that a documentary about an anti-black massacre is DEI and "not to the benefit of human kind because it focuses on a specific race, here being black" (and therefore the grant should be terminated). 28:11 in this video: https://youtube.com/watch?v=qtFdVtBb75s
Of course, there's more, like allowing ChatGPT to hallucinate and incorrectly mark grants as DEI, and then basically just having it do his entire "job". He couldn't even define what DEI is, and constantly said "I'll have to refer to the EO." He seemed to just slap the entire EO and grant list into the slop generator and accept whatever the output was, and then sent the slop up the chain.
Remember, Justin Fox is a racist, antisemitic, homophobic, transphobic piece of shit that couldn't even do his basic, yet high paying job correctly. Because of Justin Fox, hundreds of thousands lost their jobs, and people have died because of him. He also failed to make any sort of dent in the ever-growing deficit, so it was all for nothing. Justin Fox is a terrible person and employee, and no company should waste their time with hiring him in the future.
Um, were those other videos actually deleted?
Also, it's not like this is revenge porn or something. These are depositions paid for by us taxpayers, of people paid by us to supposedly do their "work". Under what possible pretext should we not have access to them?
The pretext it made them look REALLY fucken bad, people were (rightfully) very angry at their actions and were redressing their (former) employees in the form of threatening to end them lol.
I watched 2 of them and there were a lot of "holy shit" moments.
But seriously, what were the arguments given? Inconvenient objective reality is surely not a permitted reason, as you say.
Yeah, both of them looked like they were glitching the fuck out.
Getting real questions that didn't just pander to them. Something tells me they are used to being coddled all of their lives.
Uhm, it all comes back to the EO, which sums it up better than I could.
Of course I understand the EO perfectly.
What? Are these boys more afraid of the consequence end of FAFO after the Big Balls incident?
Link to videos ?
They're in multiple parts but seem all here at least:
Already taken down. Or at least it’s not letting me view the videos.
Not sure why. I just tried them and they work both in the US and via a Sweden VPN. I'm not sure if they're geolocked, but I can view them.