It also gives you a way to learn a new tech stack if you so want.
How are you learning a new tech stack, if the agent is doing it all for you?
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
It also gives you a way to learn a new tech stack if you so want.
How are you learning a new tech stack, if the agent is doing it all for you?
This whole ordeal is going to be quite a wake-up call for some orgs. They spent this whole time thinking they only paid devs to produce code, not to understand it, because the understanding part was invisible to them.
Now they’re like astronauts blasting off to space and not knowing they need to bring oxygen with them, because they’re never seen any.
You can do a task pretty well if you nudge the AI, have it write an exact explanation about every part of the architecture, code and data flow it's working with and throw relevant files into context, and correct anything that's wrong before you send it to do the task. You still have to review, but I didn't have to correct much in my experience.
But that burns like 20$ of tokens per task, at current prices that are way below the costs AI companies are paying.
While it does help me, especially with parts of the codebase I'm not familliar with, it's not sustainable, and it's actively and very quickly robbing me of my skills and knowledge. It's really a bad idea to use it, in two years time you'll be royally fucked once they raise prices to recover the trillions they are loosing right now.
So, however tempting, I simply don't use it. I won't throw away years of college and experience just to do a task a little bit faster today.
You missed the most important sentence... "While all of this is anecdotal". The rest you should read as though you are talking to the ceo of nvidia after he bought a huge short position on every AI company in the world.
And organizations have super high pain tolerance.
The organization slowly evolves along with the complexity in a demented kind of synergy and learns how to deal with it.
That rings so true.
But the thing is, pain is a warning signal. If you go jogging completely drunk and hit a tree with 6 mph, it will be painful, yes, but the pain will warn you not to do it again.
But what if you move 12 times faster?
If you drive a light motorcycle completely drunk and with no helmet, and hit a tree, pain will not be able to save you.
For company legacy codebases, yes they are dysfunctional but they have found a kind of precarious equilibrium in so far as they exist because they are making money and thus are useful by some metric. The slow movement and requirement to work somehow balances the unstoppable (with in company practices) growth of entropy and messiness.
And in a way, the money is an analgetic for the pain. Or more sharply, big companies act like junkies on a money drug because money is the only thing that ever counts.
Figure what happens if entropy is grown 100 times faster...
if you don't know how to make good code you can't expect AI to do it either
if you can code well then AI can be a great help