this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
27 points (93.5% liked)

Programming

26316 readers
1089 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/45047387

Title...

I'm kinda disgusted with Microsoft and Github has been declining into an AI-Centric hellhole, to the point my recommendations are almost exclusively AI related... And let's not forget, the new Copilot Training enabled by default (which honestly, how do you get rid of this thing, VSCode also feels intrusive with AI-First bullshittery)

I've been wondering about moving to Gitlab but.... "Finally, AI for the entire software lifecycle." is literally plastered in the landing page. So.. that feels like a no-go.

Codeberg is very decent, it's based on Forgejo so ActivityPub is also a thing (but is cross-instance contributions possible?) but it's exclusive for Source-Available and Free Projects, which, by all means, totally fine! Half of my "active" projects are for free, and are open source (does that make them FOSS even though I'm basically the only dev?)

And last but not least, Forgejo and Gitlab themselves are self-hostable, but...how expensive (price and storage) would it be to self host a Git Forge??

And maybe I'm being narrow-sighted... For FOSS projects in Github, sadly I'll have no choice but to contribute there, if that's the only place where the project resides, same for Gitlab, and Codeberg* (unless cross-instance contrib is a thing)

For now, I'm thinking of moving FOSS/OSS projects to Codeberg, but for personal projects? What are some good options?

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dhruv3006@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 3 points 3 hours ago

If you actually read his message you can see he is interested in hosting projects that aren't open source.

[–] Kissaki@programming.dev 0 points 4 hours ago

Codeberg, and because I already have a VPS (server), I'd check for Forgejo packages (I would only use them if security updates automatically update/install).

[–] Bonje@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

Already do; Codeberg is great.

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 28 points 16 hours ago

Codeberg or GitLab.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 points 9 hours ago

Radicle, codeberg, gitlab, sourcehut, tale your pick. Github isn't the only option. Far from it.

[–] talkingpumpkin@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Some alternative self-hosting options (besides full-fledged "forges"):

If you don't need issues and stuff, you could just use git and back it up (by copying or cloning/updating to some other machine).

You could deploy soft-serve, which is a self-contained git/ssh server with cool cli (beware: it's not super performant on large repos, so don't host a clone of the linux kernel on it). Since you'll use it via ssh, you don't have to bother with https, certificates, reverse proxies and stuff.

If you are willing to put some effort into it, the (imho) coolest option would be to use radicle, which is a p2p forge (beware: documentation is not great, and - even if the "core" is solid - the cli tools are very much beta still).

[–] strlcpy@programming.dev 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I went with the simplest self-hosting I could think of for my private repos:

ssh my-server 'git init --bare git/foo.git'
git clone my-server:git/foo.git

You don't get a web UI or anything but that's OK for me, I just want the repo.

[–] Splendid4117@piefed.social 12 points 16 hours ago

Note - you can completely disable all the AI features in Gitlab. In fact, they're disabled by default unless you explicitly enable them by configuring model integrations. I think its one of the better self hosted options because it had a clear maintenance and path to profitability.

I run my own GitLab on a NUC with no issues.

Disclaimer: I have contributed open source code to GitLab before.

[–] eli@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

I'm not a programmer, but I have my dotfiles and bash scripts I like to keep in private repos. I just moved my dotfiles over to Codeberg, gonna do my scripts here soon...

But been relatively painless. I can see how bigger and public projects will take some coordination and planning but...it's probably worth it?

Codeberg has been fun and simple to use, but again, I'm just a hobbyist.

[–] frankenswine@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

sourcehut, codeberg or self-hosting (cgit, forgejo, gitea, which ever suits your needs)

[–] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 5 points 16 hours ago

I've exclusively been using gitlab.com and self hosted gitlab ce for years. So that would be my choice.

[–] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 2 points 17 hours ago
[–] terabyterex@lemmy.world -3 points 15 hours ago

GitLab. You can't be emotional about ai., it's a tool

When github puts ads in commits, you say "fuck no" but gitlab giving you ai devops tools is fine. If you don't want to use it, don't.