this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
36 points (92.9% liked)

Programming

26326 readers
370 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Naich@piefed.world 7 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

They realise that it's a satire site, right?

[–] ExFed@programming.dev 2 points 5 hours ago

They built it. They're making money on it. Is that still satire?

[–] u_tamtam@programming.dev 11 points 14 hours ago

They may or may not, what makes it relevant nonetheless is the real loophole and the ethical/legal questions that ensue.

[–] Lydia_K@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago

It's good that they don't realize it's satire, the satire is doing it's job in getting people to realize how laws need to change around AI code.

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 2 points 13 hours ago

Very effective satire. I wish I would have thought of it.

I've been pointing at this problem for at least 2 years now to deaf ears, satire like this will force people to listen.

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Well, you could do this yourself too... it's not just an "issue" with AI, but that copyright is not meant to protect against competition forever.

[–] who@feddit.org 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Well, you could do this yourself too…

No, but you and someone else could collaborate to do something like it, if both of you had sufficient skill in this area.

And, importantly, it would require a great deal more time and effort.

The current laws are tuned to cost, benefit, difficulty, and volume assumptions that are made outdated by LLMs.