this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
498 points (99.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

39261 readers
4418 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 18 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago
[–] MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 176 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Weed is such a harmless little bullshit drug to be so ridiculously over-the-top hyper criminalized in some countries like bruh.

Weed is gonna ruin your life because if you have it on your person imma sens you to prison for 30 fucking years and ruin your life.

It does not. Make. Sense.

[–] Kanda@reddthat.com 2 points 2 hours ago

I did it all day every day for 12 years, then quit and went back to work like nothing happened. Try that with any other drug

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 23 hours ago (7 children)

The only issue I have with weed, and most other drugs, is that you can't easily test for them in a person's system, meaning that you can't know if someone's driving under the influence. This wouldn't be as much of a problem if not for the fact that we have have such a car centric society. I don't like people endangering other people just for a buzz.

[–] MML@sh.itjust.works 0 points 34 minutes ago (1 children)

If you can't tell what problems is it causing? What about the elderly, just because they're not actively impairing themselves further it makes it alright that they are more impaired than a normal driver?

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 15 minutes ago

Elderly people shouldn't be allowed to drive.

[–] GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The best way to eliminate this risk is public transit.

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 hours ago

Yes. I want to ban cars too.

[–] CoolCat@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

You can easily test if they're in someone's system with a saliva test, so your argument doesn't make any sense.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Blood test is better for weed. It's only detectable for 12h vs 24h with saliva.

But levels of THC aren't really correlated with impairment.

[–] CoolCat@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

12 to 24h seems good (maybe even too long imho) in the context of driving a car.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 5 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Not when the levels have no bearing on intoxication.

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 1 points 9 minutes ago

The same applies to alcohol to some degree. We as a society need to set some limits

[–] CoolCat@lemmy.world 1 points 59 minutes ago* (last edited 47 minutes ago)

I hear you. The saliva test isn't perfect, but it's something.

Where I live only a doctor is allowed to draw and test your blood, which is tough to do at the side of the road during a traffic stop. They need a lab for that. So a saliva test is much more viable in that context.

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Can you hook a saliva test to a car's ignition system to only allow sober people to start the car?

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 17 minutes ago

Now lick the knob

[–] CoolCat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

No, but not every car has a breathalyzer. Only repeat offenders get one of those. So the point still stands imo. Maybe someday the saliva test can be hooked up to the ignition.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 25 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Imagine being so car brained that you base personal freedom around it

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I honestly ......... for calling me "car brained". That insult hurt me more than any other I've received. I want to protect pedestrians and cyclists from people driving cars under the influence. I want to limit driving people's freedom to make life better for everyone.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That's honestly a very odd reaction, for what it's worth I meant it lightheartedly.

Of course I think pedestrians and cyclists also deserve safety.

I would like to point out however that a majority of incidents are drunk drivers who do not already have a device like that in their car, so it's a tad bit absurd to indicate your hard line for legalization is that when it would only apply after the fact anyway.

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry, that was too rude, I just got really upset... It's odd, I've never really gotten angry at internet comments until now.

I just wanted to point out my single issue with weed, which is more an issue with car centric infrastructure.

[–] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Nothing you said was rude. In fact everything you said was correct on all counts. I think the other person was just joking

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 16 minutes ago

I edited my comment. I said that I despised them and said "fuck you". Not that bad, but I changed it to be a little less abrasive.

[–] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think this is "car brained". They're not saying anything around public transit, just that we need to have a test for DWI and weed. People shouldn't be jailed for 30 years regardless of the presence of the test or not, but we do still need some other test. Otherwise I guarantee that "don't drive while baked" will be the next infomercial you see in a few years.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 12 points 16 hours ago

Missing the point a bit, we shouldn't base legalization around if people are going to drive their cars on a substance.

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 6 points 18 hours ago

I am 100% on bike I see no argument on there. Just don't smoke 3 day before you have to drive.

[–] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 7 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

They have mouth swabs they use now that can tell for smoking.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Eh, you can still do a blood test in conjunction with a field sobriety test. Its not as cut and dry as something like alcohol, but to be honest it really shouldn't be anyways considering how much more dangerous driving while drunk is.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Blood THC levels aren't indicative of impairment. Even high levels are only weakly associated with impairment in occasional users, and there's no correlation in regular users.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 16 minutes ago

You sound either like someone who has never smoked, or smokes way too much 😁

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 95 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Outlawing cannabis products was essentially an exercise in deliberate systemic racism in the US. (Nixon).

Unsure about the rest of the world.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 6 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Making cocaine illegal was for black people. Weed was for the hippies.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Oh yeah. To suppress the anti (Vietnam) war protests.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yup. The goal was to make both groups felons to prevent them from voting.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago

They wanted Mexicans out too.

[–] embed_me@programming.dev 14 points 18 hours ago

India here, colonial penal code outlawed it but we're too prudish to change it after independence

[–] dansemacabreingalone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I thought it was about paper prices?

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

Yep, William Randolph Hearst fucked everything over for his textile businesses long before Nixon, but it is true that racism played a big factor, namely beginning to refer to it as marijuana instead of cannabis and linking that to those pesky Latinos

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 41 points 1 day ago

IIRC the US heavily pressured other countries with tariffs to also ban it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zaphod@discuss.tchncs.de 78 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Meanwhile alcohol, one of the most harmful substances, is being consumed like water 😐

[–] ol_capt_joe@piefed.ee 34 points 1 day ago

Delicious, masterfully distilled, barrel aged, water of life πŸ‘‰πŸ˜‰πŸ‘‰πŸ₯ƒ

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 81 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] violet08_@lemmy.world 105 points 1 day ago (4 children)

They were ambassadors for airport customs at Incheon, and in this scene, they were being shown contraband found in passengers’ luggage.

[–] IntrovertTurtle@lemmy.zip 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I choose to think the 2 girls on her arms are holding her back from taking it and running. πŸ˜‚

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί