Google now : memes

[–] vanderbilt@beehaw.org 124 points 2 years ago (2 children)

When people make a big stink about Apple not implementing RCS I always bring this up. RCS has an open core sure - but it’s lacking plenty of features that people refer to when talking about RCS. Furthermore, the gateways used for Google’s RCS implementation are made by a company Google acquired. Would we be happy with Apple charging cell providers money to install iMessage gateways at whatever cost they wanted, because they hold the patents? No, so why would we give Google a pass?

If we want to fix this issue, force Google to relinquish their control of RCS and open the standard unencumbered with patents. Require telecoms to implement the standard in full and without deviation or be fined. Give phone manufacturers a few more years to comply and then it’s done.

[–] F04118F@feddit.nl 65 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Are you running for a seat in the European Parliament next year?

[–] vanderbilt@beehaw.org 42 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Unfortunately I’d be running from Italy and well, we are a bit boneheaded at the moment.

[–] TJmCAwesome@feddit.nu 12 points 2 years ago

You ain't kidding!

[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago

Ouch. My condolences.

But hey, it's not just you though; here in Finland we've had eg. multiple literal neo-Nazis in the government – one had to quit because, you know, he is a neo-Nazi, but the extremist right wing party he's from replaced him with a pedophile neo-Nazi – and our Speaker of the Parliament has publicly fantasized on his blog about murdering gay people. And that's just the highlight reel, it gets so much worse.

Europe's a bit fucked, honestly.

[–] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

While true, apple remains the bigger hurdle here. They don't seem even willing to cooperate.

[–] WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world 57 points 2 years ago

Didn't we already have this for a breid shining moment with XMPP before Google and others broke it?

[+] velox_vulnus@lemmy.ml 40 points 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

[deleted]

[–] dzervas@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

my whole experience with matrix is deeply disappointing. devices getting out of sync, not being able to decrypt messages, missing notifications and that fucking mark as read not working are daily problems

dig deeper and you’ll find the causes of the problems, which are disturbing. e.g. a json string is hashed (however 2 equal json objects can be the same while their strings are very different)

the only reason I still use it is a room I want to be part of

[–] Andrew15_5@mander.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

How it's pretty good if it's in a pre-alpha stage? The reviews tell otherwise.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 years ago

Matrix would be fantastic. Phone number accounts hosted on the carrier's instance, and can federate with other instances.

Something like (for an American phone number): @0014204206969:matrix.att.com and have each carrier share which phone numbers are assigned to which carrier in some common protocol so all you would need is a phone number.

[–] OscarRobin@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Would be goated if everyone just switched to the Signal protocol and interop was mandated, but that'll never happen unfortunately.

[–] sarmale@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Isnt signal protocol just encrypting? It doesent deliver messages

[–] OscarRobin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Signal is a means for message encryption, and if every platform used it and then were mandated to interop, they'd have to figure out how to do the actual transfer, yes. RCS is basically this except nerfed and partially Google-owned which is shit.

[–] bram@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is where Matrix comes in. Fully open source and supports federation the way Lemmy does. (Even more effectively, actually.)

[–] OscarRobin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Matrix is more of a Discord alternative than a Whatsapp alternative though unless I'm mistaken?

[–] bram@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

For Element, Matrix' flagship client, you are correct.

Anyone can build their own clients, however, and apps like FluffyChat & Syphon aim to mimick the look and feel of WhatsApp.

[–] LucidLethargy@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Spell check was invented in 1971.

[–] xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago

Meme is missing an s, literally unreadable

[–] coffeebiscuit@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Spell check existed way before 1971.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm OOTL with this. Anakin, what are you talking about?

[–] sarmale@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 years ago

found this post

[–] vanderbilt@beehaw.org 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

When people make a big stink about Apple not implementing RCS I always bring this up. RCS has an open core sure - but it’s lacking plenty of features that people refer to when talking about RCS. Furthermore, the gateways used for Google’s RCS implementation are made by a company Google acquired. Would we be happy with Apple charging cell providers money to install iMessage gateways at whatever cost they wanted, because they hold the patents? No, so why would we give Google a pass?

If we want to fix this issue, force Google to relinquish their control of RCS and open the standard unencumbered with patents. Require telecoms to implement the standard in full and without deviation or be fined. Give phone manufacturers a few more years to comply and then it’s done.

[–] Veticia@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We can also go the other way around. Force Apple to make iMessage an open standard.

[–] vanderbilt@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago

That’s true, but there would be additional challenges. Outside of the US, Android dominates the markets to the tune of +80%. In order for such an effort to have teeth, there has to be incentive for them to comply. They could pull iOS out of the EU market and remove iMessage from macOS if it came down to it. They are already such a small percentage they might just eat the loss as the cost of protecting their walled garden. Unlikely, but a possibility nonetheless.

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Seriously. Hold them all accountable. Don't be pro-google/anti-apple because you happened to give some money to one of them. Scrutinize both at all times.

[+] runswithjedi@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

[deleted]

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Google tries to make many messaging standards and programs

All fail because of mismanagement

This is supposed to be Apple's problem?

[–] N200L@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

Google didn't create RCS. The idea was floated in 2008 and in 2009 the GSM association (Non-profit, representing 700+ mobile carriers across the world) began directing the project. Since then 47 mobile network operators, 11 equipment manufacturers, and 2 operating system companies (Google & Microsoft) have pledged their support for RCS.

In fact, Google only started implementing RCS in 2019 whereas Samsung has been releasing phones since 2012 with RCS. Now RCS is actively used by over 88 operators in 59 countries with almost 400,000,000 daily users.

tl;dr - Apple not using RCS is Apple's problem when the rest of the world does.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

It's not Android users who are getting ugly green text boxes on their phones.

[–] ursakhiin@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

Apple could open up iMessage.

[–] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)

RCS will be closed?

[–] sarmale@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The implementation google pushes for is, also couldnt find any foss rcs apps

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 years ago

there's the part that google added on top, which isn't open.

And then there's rcs itself, which isn't open either. You need to get a license from the gsma

[–] zorro@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I believe this is the specification: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8591

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Google always

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

[–] sarmale@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago

La asta chiar nu m-am gândit

[–] botorfj@lemdro.id 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

what's that font?

[–] sarmale@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago

Pixel mplus 12

Memes

Rules: