this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

NFL

119 readers
2 users here now

A place for NFL news, game highlights and everything that excites you about American Football.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Listen, i’m not saying his time isn’t coming to an end at the elite level. But one poor season in 23 years does not call for some of the revisionism occurring here lately. Arguably, the defences he’s still producing (2022, 2021, 2020) have kept the Patriots from rebuilding properly. It isn’t easy in this league to escape from 8-8 hell without a franchise QB.

“Brady made him”. You can use whatever stat you want here, but let’s use the most basic one. Points allowed per game. Of course there are influences here. Time of possession, special teams, ability to generate turnovers. But at its most basic level this is what determines the result of a game.

Brady had 20 seasons as a Patriot. He had a top 10 defence in 17 of them. In 3 super bowl victories, the Patriots played 3 of the top 15 offences in NFL history. 01 Rams, 16 Falcons and 18 Rams. 17 points, 22 points(pick six), 3 points. Even throw the record breaking 04 Colts in there, 3 pts. If we change to PTS per drive, he still has 15 top 10 defences!

Manning had 4, Rodgers had 3, Brees had 2. All three had great ball security and time of possession.

Is Brady the GOAT, yes. His consistency in clutch moments puts him ahead of the likes of Peyton and Rodgers. Did he make Bill the greatest defensive mind in history, no!

Brady record when scoring 20+in the playoffs: 32-4. Rodgers is 12-9 in this statistic for a direct comparison.

Average finish in points per drive among notable QBs

Brady: 9th

Rivers: 15th

Peyton: 18th

Rodgers: 18th

Brees: 20th

Mahomes: 20th

And we are trying to pretend Bill didn’t give Brady a significant advantage over his peers? Another 2 super bowls as a DC.

(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fragglebags@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Im sure Robert Kraft will take this into consideration haha.

[–] toddfredd@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Look at how quickly they turned on Coaches like Landry, Noll and Shula. Skip Bayless was a scumbag all the way back in the late eighties when he called Tom Landry “Mount Senility”. When the glory years run their coarse it just seems inevitable that people who sing their praises for so long take a perverse pleasure in tearing down what they built up in these coaches.

[–] aManHasNoUsername99@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

3 crap seasons and a wc beating. Maybe his defenses have had their moments but he’s been pretty incompetent as a HC/gm for a while now. They used to be fun to watch but now they are like the jets.

[–] FinsFan130929@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Maybe if he wasnt such a shit GM for offense currently he wouldn't have the criticism he's getting now about his coaching

Of course he's one of the greatest coaches of all time, but he's also setting his team up for failure by disregarding the offense that he hasnt had to care about since he had Tom fucking Brady

[–] SheldonMF@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Bill Belicheck is GOATed, but he has made some tremendously boneheaded decisions concerning his offense.

[–] PoopyMcFartButt@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago
[–] AnySeaworthiness5779@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

In the two super bowl losses to the Giants, the defense allowed just 17 and 22 points. It was our offense that didn't get the job done.

[–] Messigoat3@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

2 Pro Bowl draftees in 10 years is not good.

[–] One_Spinal_Cracker@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

He wasn’t a very good head-coach before Brady, and it seems like he isn’t very good without him 🤷🏿‍♂️

[–] agk23@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Not to mention winning the Seattle superbowl by having balls of steel and not calling a timeout before the interception, when every other coach would have. He knew the play that was coming. He knew his defense knew the play. And they won that ring because of it.

[–] Rampant_baconator@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

As a Vikings/Patriots fan, I’m having no fun weathering this storm of calling for Kirk/BB to be taken out back and shot in the head.

[–] Wheneveryouseefit@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I do not understand any of the hate Belichick is getting atm.

[–] GizmoSoze@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

How many passing yards does Belichick personally have now that Brady is gone? Zero. And zero completions. Proof he’s overrated.

[–] dandunt@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

No, you don’t get it. Tom Brady motivated these Patriot defences to be so good, because he’s such a great leader. Bill is obviously a fraud.

[–] Dave_Pumpkins_01@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

"has went" is never correct.

[–] jetpack_operation@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

This flip is so funny to see. The whole idiotic "Brady or Belichick" stuff began almost exclusively to handwave away Brady's success by fans of other QBs. For years and years, it was used to disparage Brady's accomplishments as a QB and, ya know, iF mAnNiNg hAd bELicHicK he woulda won it 10!

I adamantly defended Brady at the time because players play. You can be the best coach in the world, but if your player doesn't jibe with what you're doing, you're not going to win an insane amount of championships and compete for two decades straight.

I'm going to adamantly defend Belichick's role in the dynasty because writing him off now is as stupid as writing off Tom Brady then. There's valid criticism of how he's running the team now but you can't take away the program he built around Brady. I do think there are elements that are essentially tall tales (the Pats defenses are largely overrated around here outside or 2004 and 2019 and a few others) but you don't win with those not-amazing defenses without the discipline, situational football, and adjustments that you can't attribute to anyone else but Belichick. In fact, the OP is using the extremely flawed metric of defensive scoring to rank defenses.

They were amazing complements to each other -- criticize Bill's current moves and intransigence and fruitless nepotism now if you want, that's fair, but let's not revise history.

[–] Quiddity131@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There has long been hate towards Belichick and now that things are on the down turn for him they have taken advantage of the time to pounce on him. Whether that's jealousy because the Pats beat their team over and over again, or due to extreme media bias because he doesn't make their job easier.

Fact of the matter is that Belichick drafted Tom Brady. Belichick kept Brady as the fourth quarterback on the roster his rookie season. Keeping a fourth quarterback on a roster is virtually unheard of, yet Belichick did it. When Brady got his chance to start the next year expectations were in the toilet. Bledsoe was not only the number one pick in the draft but also signed the biggest contract in NFL history recently. By the time Bledsoe was healthy and ready to return the Pats were around .500. Belichick kept Brady in as the starter and got absolutely demolished by the media and fans for doing so. While there was a decent amount of Brady support the majority was on the Bledsoe side, especially among those with influence. There were calls for Belichick to be fired over picking Brady over Bledsoe. The Pats first Super Bowl contained a grand total of 1 Tom Brady TD pass the entire playoffs. In the Super Bowl, the Pats scored 20 points, of which 7 was on a pick six, 10 were off of short fields produced by the defense forcing turnovers and 3 points were on the last drive of the game where even John Madden was doubting Brady could do it. When the season was over Belichick traded Bledsoe to the Bills and kept Brady and once again faced a lot of heat over it.

With all that said, in what universe can it be said Brady made Belichick? At that point it was the other way around. Belichick was the one who had faith in Tom Brady and stuck with him despite all the people blasting him for doing so. It is total revisionist history to act like it was simply luck that Brady became the QB rather than Belichick drafting and developing him and putting him in the position to succeed despite the claims from so many "experts" that Belichick was an idiot for relying upon Brady.

Now Brady certainly improved his game significantly over time and I would say that the dynamic eventually changed such that Brady was more important to the team than Belichick was. But Brady doesn't become that if Belichick didn't develop him and put him in that position. If Brady isn't drafted by the Pats odds are pretty good as a sixth round draft pick that he's out of the league within a couple of years and never gets the chance to become the GOAT.

Also as a Pats fan who has been supporting Brady since 2001 I can say for a great many years I heard non-stop that he was just a system QB. That Peyton Manning was better. That Donovan McNabb was better. That Michael Vick was better. Insert numerous other QBs throughout the years. I also heard non-stop that Brady had an unfair advantage because he had Belichick as his coach. That he could rely on great defenses while other QBs could not (ironicaly if you look at Peyton Manning and all the failing he had in the playoffs up until he finally won it in 2006, it was nearly always the offense letting the team down, so people were often totally wrong on that anyway). Years later people want to pretend like none of this ever happened. Years later people who blasted Brady for years, in some cases decades suddenly now act like they always claimed he was the GOAT.

To me it's never been all or nothing. The Pats won 6 Super Bowls and went to 3 more because of Belichick and Brady being there together. Neither would have had the success without the other. By the end of his career Brady gets the nod over Belichick because he won a Super Bowl without him. And he was always the one on the field actually getting it done. But this recent mentality that its all or nothing and that Belichick rode on the coat tails of Brady and deserves 0 credit for developing him is absurdity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] engiudub@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Ok cool but a head coach is supposed to coach all 3 phases

[–] toastwasher@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

It’s bait. It’s all farming clicks. You have fallen for it

[–] steakfarts@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Bill belicheck one of great defensive coaches and situational coaches of all time. It’s just know nothings that would say that. It’s not Brady vs belicheck. It takes a team and winning is not by accident

[–] XuX24@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

People forget how QB dependant this league is Many slandered Brady for years saying he was a player that was only good because of Bellichick and his system now that they saw Brady leave and win without him they immediately turn on Bill. It's hard to develop a QB and make him work look at all the teams that hav drafted QBs in the past 5 years and see how many have immediately become a success, only a small amount have actually succeeded and Mac Jones hasn't been what many expected. I always use the example of the Niners, imo they had a team that could've easily won like 3 SBs in the past couple of years and they haven't because their QB is not good enough.

If they do the dumb thing and fire bill some team with a good base but terrible coaching can get a pretty good option.

[–] WilliamBoost@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

If the toxic fans chase away the best thing that's ever happened to the Patriots, me and my fan dollars are following.

[–] devonta_smith@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Gregg Popovich's win percentage without Tim Duncan is .476

Bill's without Brady is .462

Pop is unanimously considered a legend even by the most ignorant nephews on r/NBA, whereas on r/NFL Bill Belichick is, and has always been, a hack

[–] Gase_Sucks_Balls@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I think its a combination of both. I think Bill was largely responsible for those 3 out 4 4 SB wins in the early 2000s that made Brady hyped up and then Brady git better and better and by the end was making Bill look better. You can argue that Bill made Brady what he was and that in different circumstances Brady would have never become what he did. Early 2000s Brady was not bearly as good as Brady was in the 30s ans 40s.

[–] narwhalyurok@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

What slander? Belichick is a cheater

[–] Fit_Guest4469@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

He is a great DC but an average HC.

[–] _Shoresy_69@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I don't think there's ever been a better litmus test for basic football knowledge/history than a person's stance on Belichick.

If you can't recognize him as the GOAT coach, you're a fraud of a fan. It's that simple.

[–] BillsFan82@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

His pre and post Brady record just isn’t very good. The cheating scandals don’t help him either. He’s still a hall of fame coach, but this tarnishes his legacy a bit.

[–] aLegionOfDavids@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Honestly I’ve stopped looking at and engaging with 99% of patriots media and social media, especially the sub. The amount of entitled, young, fairweather fans and slander I see in there is really sad. The mere suggestion that BB is done is absolutely ridiculous to me. I’m not saying criticism is unfounded - I think BB the GM isn’t BB the Coach, but goddamn you’d think he’s the worst coach in nfl history with the sentiment towards him right now. I’m genuinely ashamed of most of my team’s internet fan base this season.

[–] Paladin8753@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Shula got run out the same way lol

[–] goobitypoop@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I mean obviously he was the GOAT in his era. He's 72, has had the team going south for 4 straight years, let's usher in a new era even if that means our defenses for the next 5 years about 20% worse than if Belichick was coaching them.

[–] lionheart4life@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I hate the Pats but come on, he's the best coach of this era. Maybe ever. They won all those championships, the whole team was good to do that, and the coach gets credit for that.

[–] CommenceTheWentz@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

2 things are true: Belichick was a great coach, and the game has passed him by. You don’t have to pretend he sucked for 20 years and you also don’t have to pretend he doesn’t suck now

[–] jakenimbo@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

BB is a good coach but it’s time for the Pats to make a change. The direction they are heading is not good. Their roster construction has been horrible

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›