this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
343 points (94.3% liked)

Technology

70847 readers
3006 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Apple has a memory problem and we're all paying for it::Apple still sells expensive "Pro" computers with just 8GB of RAM and charges a fortune for more.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pyroglyph@lemmy.world 110 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Alternate title: Apple charges fortune for underspecced machines, morons still buy them

Please tell me, as someone who has not given Apple money in over a decade, how I am paying for this.

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago

Apple fans will say with a straight face they can't use anything other than a Mac.

[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 82 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (23 children)

Apple fan here, and I love what they’ve done with hardware the last few years. That said…. I have to agree. Base RAM config is silly low, and higher RAM and SSD configs are stupid expensive. It’s a money maker for sure, I wish it wasn’t so obviously a cash grab. I’d be ok with a bit more padding in the base hardware price if the ram wasn’t so expensive to upgrade.

In the old days this was a moot point because you buy base config and immediately swap for after market big sticks- I did that for decades, but these days with soldered RAM and storage…. Eh, it’s a bit of a kick in the balls.

I am stoked for my new M3 next week though, good thing work pays for it!

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 years ago

Imagine if you had to buy it yourself. Really. Screw apple. I'm done with their blatant manipulation and control.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] Manmikey@lemmy.world 75 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The closing sentence of the article....

"as Apple customers, we shouldn’t stand for it"

Apple customers....

"Here's my $200"

[–] Baku@aussie.zone 6 points 2 years ago

You missed a 0

[–] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 54 points 2 years ago (6 children)

"we're all paying for it"

Journalism these days is fucking awful

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

It's from a news organisation called "MacWorld". What were you expecting exactly?

[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Well I do think the high cost of expansion RAM in Apple products is tied to school shootings, gerrymandering, and the prison industrial complex.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Memory is memory. Apple's attempt at branding these machines as "different" as if they were more efficient at using that memory, is absolutely fucking stupid. These Pro machines are used for large file operations like videos, and their response is simply "guess you need to pay more".

I feel like they're trying to get back to the PPC days where generally available parts are not cheap. I hope plenty of cheap alternatives show up on Newegg or wherever. Fuck this bullshit.

[–] turkalino@lemmy.yachts 8 points 2 years ago (10 children)

Memory is memory

Definitely not true hardware-wise. L2 cache is different from DDR3 RAM is different from DDR4 RAM... in price and performance

Software-wise, yes, the operating system abstracts away the differences and memory is memory

Apple's memory upgrade costs are probably 90% usual Apple bullshit pricing, 10% grounded in reality. I'm thinking that the 10% may be something like the motherboards are designed without memory upgrades in mind, so if you want more RAM, they have to use a special mobo which they prefab less of

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Apple's "memory upgrade" is making the claim that you can do with half for the same amount of work on x86. It is 100% untrue.

You tried to delve into speed. But speed won't outpace a 1TB video file you're trying to edit. If you're working with smaller chunks of smaller files that have fast operations ONLY, then make claim as such. This is a ploy for upgrade cash, plain and simple. Nothing about these chips moves the needle on memory usage BY HALF. What a dumbass thing to assert as a company.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Memory speed doesn't really matter if your apps start thrashing

Edit: thrashing is very likely to occur on something marketed as "pro". I have a work PC with 8gb of RAM, and my job requires me to edit video. I need to be careful on how big my video files are, because it WILL start thrashing. This is the reality. Professional apps require a lot of memory pages, and they are never open on their own.

Edit 2: I guess the thoughts from a computer scientist are less important than corporate marketing.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] impiri@lemm.ee 40 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I absolutely love Apple Silicon—the performance to power ratio is wonderful, and the high-speed memory makes things like LLMs work great—but the RAM upcharge is insane, and shipping anything "Pro" with 8GB of RAM should be criminal in 2023.

I really hope that Qualcomm can make some noise with their new laptop/desktop processors. Anything to light a fire under Apple's ass and make them stop skimping on RAM.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] thorbot@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm not paying for it, I just go to downloadmoreram.com, DUH

[–] goldisgood4u@lemmings.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't pay for the computer, I just go to downloadmorecomputer.biz

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago

It seemed obvious to me that they do this so that they can say the MBP costs “as low as X”, but in fact everyone needs to pay at least $200 more

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago

RAM is boring... THE FINISH IS TITANIUM!!!

THAT'S LITERALLY OUR ENTIRE MARKETING CAMPAIGN!

[–] DingoBilly@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago (10 children)

Yes. Unfortunately people who buy Apple don't care. This is what happens when you prioritise brand and design over functionality. You end up paying more for the brand (worse shit, but hey you can feel good about buying such a great product!).

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We are? Pretty sure I ain't.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

*fan bois are paying for it

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I can't believe that Apple would do this. It's so not like them to cripple great machines with one horrendous bottleneck. Like could you imagine if they released an iMac in 2020 that they sold until the release of the M1 iMac that had a 1TB hard drive in it as a boot device? That'd be insane.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 22 points 2 years ago

It's even worse when you consider there's no dedicated video memory, so this is shared between graphics and the rest of the system.

[–] Desistance@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

He's paying for it. Many of us don't buy Apple products.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] breckenedge@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I recently had to replace my Mac and was not at all happy with the ridiculous 8GB default. Ended up getting my first Windows machine in 10+ years. Same for my sis, she really wanted a Mac but work was only going to shell out $1500. You can get a helluva Windows machine for $1500 (64GB of RAM and 2TB HD). Sure it may not be “Retina” or have an insane color profile, but like great TVs, most people can’t tell unless they’re right next to a superior one.

[–] orgrinrt@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Having had multiples of windows and linux laptops in the past, I’ve gotta say that one can’t put a price on convenience and UX. I never liked using a laptop, carrying one around, especially working with one, until I ate my pride and tried a MacBook.

This is entirely subjective though. Previously I always compared the specs like that too, but I’ve come to realize there’s plenty more to these products beyond what can be listed in the spec sheet and easily compared like that.

But this is neither here or there, just that your message rang an old bell, and I thought I’d just chime in. I hope you have a great time with the new computers, we humans have different tastes and needs 😌

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (9 children)

Can you elaborate further on the benefits? I have a Mac mini M1, a MacBook Pro M2, a more powerful Lenovo laptop, a more powerful Dell XPS, and a more powerful windows desktop (on paper).

I don't use them a lot, but thus far, I struggle to find any benefit to MacOS. I use them because I have to and, generally, no longer than that. I mean, I might as well use Linux at that point and make my life easier and productivity faster. Mac keyboard shortcuts are an absolute nightmare to me (but maybe I'm just not used to them?)

I must be missing something, because some people swear by them.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shasta@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago

Damn. I wish there was some other alternative

[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nah bro, we are all NOT. I would only touch a Apple product if it had tits.

[–] everett@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Unfortunately, Apple's worst habits trickle down to other manufacturers who see what they manage to get away with and start taking notes.

[–] jecht360@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

This is what I worry about. I'd say that people should vote with their wallets, but that doesn't do anything because every manufacturer follows along on stupid trends like this. Hopefully it dies at Apple this time and doesn't spread.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] khalic@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not that I doubt the power of complaining on a niche social media but… https://www.apple.com/feedback/macbookpro.html Here’s a feedback form if you want to let Apple know it’s too much…

[–] AWittyUsername@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Feedback with your wallet. But that won't happen.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Swarfega@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I doubt the average Apple customer even looks at specs. They just see the Apple badge and are sold.

[–] ebc@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 years ago (9 children)

I buy and use Macbook Pros for work (web dev), and I do look at specs. And yeah, 8GB is ridiculous and the upgrade prices are absurd. Amazingly good machine, though.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AlijahTheMediocre@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (6 children)

I'll never understand brand loyalty, for the price of a Mac you can get a machine that's 10x more powerful with the same software being available in Windows.

[–] AWittyUsername@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Except a lot of the software isn't available. There are pros and cons to both. I've done windows, Linux and now I have a MacBook. It's better than Linux and Windows in a lot of ways but also worse in a lot of ways.

[–] khalic@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

It’s about user experience for me. I’m a software dev, I work with linux or unix systems. When i’m home I don’t want spend my time configuring a windows machine with terrible UX. OSX is very well built, built-in basic security, etc. It’s just much less hassle Edit: also, it being a unix derivative, if I need to configure it, i can just use my knowledge from work and not have to look for the usually nonsensical number of checkboxes and menus I have to look for on windiws

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] superbirra@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

laughing from my 64gig 1000 eur tuxedo :p

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I remember back in the 90's when some Macintosh computers came with resistors making them slower, so that Apple could sell "budget" models of their faster line of computers.

We were savvy and would remove them, but I bet 99% of buyers had no clue and just went along with it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The person that can somehow manage to successfully fool Scrooge TimCook to download more RAM deserves my absolute respect.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Exactly! I bought the last Mac Mini with upgradeable ram and got it from 8gb to 64gb for less than going to 16gb factory installed would cost me. After this one is done, I'm not sure I can justify buying another one.

[–] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I've always been interested in if there were a way to bake more RAM onto these boards. Presumably the pads are there and they're just not populated, so could you make a stencil for the solder balls with a cnc and buy another RAM chip and stick it in to one of those directed heat platforms. Would macos accept that, or would it throw a hissy fit because of miss matched licenses.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›