Streaming companies lower prices making pirating inconvenient
Streaming companies raise prices to make more money
Streaming companies raise prices making pirating an option again
this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
372 points (97.4% liked)
memes
15644 readers
2936 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
And in the current condition of streaming video, it's a service problem AND a pricing problem. If there was a single service that had nearly every title available, that service could maybe be worth 30-40 ish a month. But instead now if you want access to all titles you have to subscribe to a ton of separate services, never know where to find what you're looking for, and would have to pay around a hundred bucks a month. So instead i pirate, where the cost is zero dollars a month and everything is always located in the same place.
Imagine paying to not own something and then being unable to watch because your device is unsupported. Whatever that means for a current web browser…
I'm in favor of being able to pay to access a library containing 99% of titles in existence, even though i don't "own" permanent access to them. If i had to pay a higher price to "own" each individual title then i would have access to VASTLY less media. But for that monthly payment it must offer access to 99% of titles in existence, and the price must be reasonable for the amount of entertainment value i actually derive from it. Spotify is a perfect example of a 99% complete library at a reasonable price. And yeah as you point out, the service must be available on all devices, like Spotify is.
Dinosaurs eat man...
🎵 do what you want cuz' a pirate is free, you are a pirate.🎵
He will always be number one.
They've maneuvered themselves to the point where they're just another cable to cut. I'm about to hop in my big ship and cut the cable holding it to the dock. It's the high seas for me!
As competition increases, price should decrease. Unless one of them increases price and doesn't suffer for it and then the rest get FOMO and follow suit.
I feel like the end of result of this is eventually these companies saying "ok I guess nobody is interested in streaming anymore" and bringing out something people want even less.
I paid for a long long time but I'm going back to stealing I guess. Going to be a pain in the ass but my media bill is like $200/mo.
When I was younger and I seen the way storage was going. I envisioned a system where you buy a digital copy and have it for life. But you could still share you "dvd's" with your friends just like you could with ps2 saves.
The only way to own some 40 year old movie digitally for some reasonable price like a discount bin dvd is to illegally download it.
Subscriptions numbers are verifiably up, though.