this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2026
6 points (100.0% liked)

Nowhere Else To Share

1156 readers
3 users here now

I didn't know which community to post something in, and so here we are.

Please comment if you know a more appropriate community for a post.


Be nice. All instance rules apply.


Rules:

  • Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  • No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  • No Ads / Spamming.
  • No pornography.

Règles :

  • Soyez respectueux. Tout le monde doit se sentir le bienvenu ici.
  • Pas de bigoterie - y compris le racisme, le sexisme, le capacitisme, l’homophobie, la transphobie ou la xénophobie.
  • Pas de publicités / Pas de spam.
  • Pas de pornographie.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Grown-ass adult criticizes a children's movie (it could have been enjoyable for literally everyone but blandness = profit apparently):

Spoiler includes references to A Psalm for the Wild Built by Becky Chambers
They fully lost me when the killer robots started blowing everything up to kill the- *checks notes -...Geese that flew in through a ventilation shaft. Then those same killer robots burned down an entire forest and threatened the lives of every animal in it to- *checks notes -retrieve another robot. I mean, I suppose I get that part because by now Universal Dynamics has been shown to not be all that great. It didn't have to be like that though. The antagonist that had been present for the entire movie up to that point was nature; wind, water, rock and claw. It was beating the hell out of our derpy, loveable robot protagonist and the introduction of UD as another antagonist was perfunctory and useless.

I have recently finished reading Becky Chambers' Monk & Robot series, the first book is titled: A Psalm for the Wild Built which I erroneously assumed The Wild Robot was at least partially inspired by and until the killer robots it could have been. A Psalm for the Wild Built has been described as the first mainstream Hopepunk/Solarpunk novel and I was wanting this movie to tap into that more then just having it as a set piece. They could have made this movie a classic; a ground breaking, thoughtful movie on what our future could look like after climate change settles down (hah). Instead we get killer robots, lasers and a forest fire (like the one you're experiencing right now kids! Yay! Isn't that fun?!). I'm glad I didn't pay anything for it because I skipped through almost half of it. I'm also glad I didn't take my non-existent kids to see it.

They could have salvaged this corporate script by replacing the cliche, evil tentacle bot with a young intern sent to the boonies to retrieve a probably broken robot. They would then realize this bot learned how to speak with animals, perform field repairs and provide support to hold back the main antagonist: nature.

The ending was confusing too... the predators just decide not to eat anything. I know it's a children's film but I think a lot of children would be confused by that, especially since it was introduced as one of the main premises of the film in the beginning... AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

It was a total nothingburger wasn't it? It bothered me a bit after but I couldn't quite put my finger on it.

[–] videogamesandbeer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I enjoyed the movie quite a bit. It's a film adaptation of the children's book The Wild Robot by Peter Brown.

I believe there's more books in the series but the film only adapted the first one.

I am very interested in these other books you mentioned now. Thanks for that!

[–] justvibez@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Do you have kids? My sister was bawling her eyes out by the end of it.