this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
117 points (92.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

36207 readers
1281 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Even if it's just an archived version, someone somewhere will find utility in IT or coding advice posted over a century ago.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Doubt it. The way Web companies work, they eventually enter an entshitification phase and then die out. Zero chance stackoverflow last until the end of the century.

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 14 points 2 years ago

I used to work for a very old company that still has digitized copies of many, if not most, of its oldest records available for reference. It was surreal looking at internal technical documentation for things that stopped existing 50 years ago

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

OP said "even if it's an archived version." But sure continue to push your emotional state onto an otherwise unrelated conversation

[–] TheTetrapod@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Who downvoted this? The person you replied to didn't read the post.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago

People are doubtful, but I read a post on Gamefaqs from like, 25 years ago and they went through plenty of enshittification. I look forward to sharing the ancient texts with my great grandkids on how to get the best sword in The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past.

[–] rem26_art@kbin.social 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Im sure people will still be using Java 8 then, so its fine

[–] TheFriendlyDickhead@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago

And every single bank will still use COBOL

[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Plus all the questions about java.util.Date will still be relevant in Java version 100.

Hell. They may even undeprecate java.util.Date .

[–] Sabata11792@kbin.social 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

When you bump a 100 year old thread because the only answer was some guy telling OP to use different software.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Maybe if science extends our lives substantially, the original poster will respond.

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The mods will by then be replaced with bots that remove every new question by default because it was probably answered like 65 years ago and if not it's not a good question.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 3 points 2 years ago

As long as it posts the original link and never closes the original... I'm okay with that.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Probably rare. I guess occasionally people link to old usenet posts...

Somehow, C will still be around.

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Only if people are still around in 100 years.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

More likely that AI will be answering questions drawing on training sets containing forum posts that are over 100 years old.

[–] DrQuint@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

The AI: "Question marked as duplicate."

[–] perviouslyiner@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

And The Art of Computer Programming will finally be finished?

[–] WashedOver@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I have to wonder the medium we will be using then. Will it be a heads up display in our eyes by then?

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Maybe we will just share a hive mind, Borg-style.

[–] funkajunk@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

As AI keeps progressing, it's more than likely that humans will no longer code anything in the near future.

You'll start a conversation with your AI, describe what you are trying to achieve, and the AI can write and debug code faster and better than you ever could.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You're down voted, but you're right.

Naysayers are looking at AI capabilities today. Not AI capabilities in 10-20 years.

AI accelerates AI development/advancement.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

At some point AI will be able to train itself, improvise, and even experiment with solutions to find the optimal ones. I wonder how long it will take.