this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2026
235 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

87854 readers
2116 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dandi8@fedia.io 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But I was told AI is actually great for open source now and accepted with open arms...! /s

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If you know what you're doing, AI can be a very useful tool. However, a lot of people have no clue what they're doing and they use AI to amplify their incompetence.

[–] dandi8@fedia.io 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Maybe one day someone can actually prove the mythical usefulness of AI beyond software devs who think they're 19% faster but are actually 10% slower.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Yes. They could definitely fund studies to do so! They have the money! Hmm.

[–] Crit@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That study was redone and the results were less conclusive the second time around

[–] dandi8@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

They were less conclusive because they couldn't find participants. Probably because they paid a third of what the previous study did.

[–] phil@lemmy.openitco.de 4 points 1 week ago

I haven't met a single AI user who doesn't claim (s)he uses it in a smart way.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 week ago
[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Becoming"? It has been for months now.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 week ago

About a year or two. Holy shit.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Love articles that just summarize a blog or social media post while adding absolutely nothing.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In my experience, the users behind this tend to be a state of AI Psychosis.

They're the kind of user who forked or started some giant project, with a wall of text and emojiis and tables in the readme, yet theres no concrete information on how well it actually works. They submit some gigantic PR that touches a ton of files... for a feature that already exists in the project, and they apparently werent aware of.

And this is another tell. This is not some rogue agent like people think, its some person deep down a rabbit hole that might think they're contributing to QEMU. They arent necessarily malicious; just a bit crazy.

Malicious versions do exist, but thats usually motivated by grifters trying to pad their resume with contributions. Theyd do that on GitHub, not Gitlab.

[–] jlow@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago
[–] RepleteLocum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ddosing is illegal. Sure, US won't care, but you could try it in the EU.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Does this actually meet the legal criteria for DDoS though?

If AI actually worked, it would filter the bullshit for them.