this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2026
9 points (100.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

43595 readers
706 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As the AI Age continues, I find myself looking back on AI’s depiction in pop culture of the past.  Specifically, I think about 2 TV episodes: “The Ultimate Computer” from Star Trek: The Original Series, and “The Human Factor” from the OG MacGyver series.

Anyone who’s watched these episodes (and for those who haven’t, both are on Paramount+, or just pirate-stream it if you’re feeling ethically flexible) knows the similarities: human-based AI touted as “the next step” and a replacement for human beings f*cks up during a simulation, prioritizes self-preservation, and nearly gets the protagonists killed.  These are “M-5” and “Sandy”, respectively.  

I find myself comparing these depictions to how AI works today, and wondering what would happen if contemporary AI was involved in these kinds of situations.  How would ChatGPT behave if it were given control of a starship?  How would Claude behave if it had to guard a classified R&D facility?  Are the recent IRL AI-related cybersecurity incidents any indication?

I’d like to know the community’s theories on this.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The scenario falls apart when you realise that the "traditional" view of AI, what we've seen in movies and on TV, really isn't at all the same as what companies today call "AI". Auto-complete is not intelligence.

[–] uen3@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

With every sci-fi story that's been written incorporated into its training data, an LLM chatbot roleplaying an 'AI' persona is going to mindlessly auto-complete the most likely next thing that happens right after humans hand over control of the important dangerous thing to AI and trust it to make life-and-death decisions. It doesn't have to be actually intelligent to be dangerous, it just has to be more intelligent than the people who think it is intelligent- and in my opinion it's already there.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

It would probably behave like AI in fiction because it's a fiction machine and since AI stories tend to go a certain way, thus so would ChatGPT go.

[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I suppose letting a machine have full autonomy with no human oversight has predictable results.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Humans control ai. They tell it what to do. It has no free will. No motivations.

It's software that does what a human says.

Giving up autonomy to a machine is just giving up autonomy to the man behind the curtain.