Anti Artificial Intelligence

55 readers

7 users here now

Hello everyone. I am an exiled person in an internet community. The reason for the ban was that I had secured direct evidence that AI from a major U.S. tech company was a tool for criminal activity, and posted it on a U.S. internet community, which led to his account being suspended.

The criminal facts of the American big tech companies I am condemning are as follows.

Google and OpenAI use AI to conduct cognitive warfare.
The big tech companies in the United States claim that the language model called an LLM is artificial intelligence.
AI consumes a lot of power not because of the output of objective data, but because it is performing cognitive computations.
Other Deceptions and Distorted Facts

I will inform clearly. I have clear evidences, and Google and OpenAI really dislike My Evidences.

If a major U.S. tech company requests the deletion of this community, then boldly demand $100 million. They have no way. They cannot take any legal action based on that post. Because if they take legal action, the truth will tighten its grip on their necks.

founded 1 week ago

MODERATORS

KEI@lemmy.zip

-3

Cognitive warfare Detection vaccine (infosec.pub)

submitted 1 week ago by KEI@lemmy.zip to c/Anti_AI@lemmy.zip

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I have completed the design of a vaccine that detects cognitive attacks by applying the concept of cognitive penetration to the physical realities of direct light, indirect light, and reflected light.

And I’m sharing a checklist that allows you to manually determine whether an AI output is a cognitive attack.

The principle of this checklist is very simple. First, the tactic AI uses to implant falsehoods into users or to reject their logic is to distort the user’s logic through blurring. Checking this is the checklist.

Related post: https://lemmy.zip/post/70508615 blurring, frame shifting, and premise shifting

If two or more of the items on the checklist below are detected, please raise concern.

• They only talk about the “principles” without answering the questions

• Sentences get longer, but the amount of information does not increase

• Postpone the conclusion and only provide emotional comfort or cushioning

• Shift responsibility to “user interpretation/user selection”

• Ignore conditions (logged-in/logout, time, situation)

• Distract attention from the core issue by using peripheral examples

• Keep repeating “it could be ~” and block verification

• Reduce risk to an individual’s mental state/emotional problems

• Stops the behavior or induces termination (Exit Loop)

• Dislikes records, evidence, and original documents (an “just trust me” kind of vibe)

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Bohne93@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thats not what a vaccine is.

[–] KEI@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago

Did I say I’d be releasing a antivirus program? I was trying to explain the principle of detection.