this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2026
94 points (100.0% liked)

News

39106 readers
2583 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Shitget convinced he must make his own version of Universal Soldiers, and the generals are blindly complying.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 41 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm confused, I thought gender affirming treatment was illegal?

Isn't this affirming a gender?

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Shitget insists there are only two genders, and he's pretty fucking hellbent to please his tent-revival clientele.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 27 points 4 days ago (2 children)

For women, the guidance does not mandate routine testosterone blood tests, but it calls for screening for fatigue and disrupted menstrual cycles that can be associated ​with hormonal dysregulation ​and conditions called ⁠low-energy availability and relative energy deficiency in sport. The document lays out guidelines for when it ​is appropriate to prescribe off-label testosterone in women, ​namely for ⁠postmenopausal women with unusually low sexual desire.

[–] Throbbing_banjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 4 days ago (2 children)

What in the everliving fuck is wrong with these people?

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

They are basically trying to gender-purify the military. They’re trying to dump all the women.

People still don’t understand that a horrifying percentage of these absolute fuckwits watched Handmaid’s Tale and thought it was an aspirational utopian story.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 3 days ago

hesgeth already dumped a high ranking women.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 4 points 3 days ago

A very wild, unscientific guess: they want women recruits to be ok with ahhh... Coerced... sexual activity from men recruits.

Don't worry about the sailors who have been starving on an unserviced dilapidated aircraft carrier. Or the fact they tried suicide to get off it. Definitely only worry about your red pill man juice status.

[–] Ozzy@piefeed.com 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Testosterone makes you a better killer or your sexual assaults better?
A better drunk?

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 2 points 3 days ago

yes, yes, no

[–] beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What a collosal waste of tax payer money.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wait until the class action lawsuits ten years from now from bald veterans with raisin balls and huge breasts.

[–] dangling_cat@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Accidentally invest in HRT researches by creating diverse and large datasets

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The neurenberg trials have allready established that "orders are orders" is not a credible defence.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

... for blatant crimes against humanity, yes. Testosterone screening may be many dumb things but it's not that.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I non-medical chemical intervention against one's will is an assault.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 0 points 3 days ago

The article does not in any way suggest that will happen, so I guess that's fine.

[–] webp@mander.xyz 4 points 3 days ago

That one time the US forces troops onto hrt yet we are terrorists for it.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

mandatory testosterone deficiency screening

aww goddammit what did ~~RFK jr.~~ the brainworm posse come up with now?

This is a thing but it's so rare....

I guess they're going to pump soldiers up with testosterone regardless. Or it's just another zero effort publicity stunt.

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yep, roided out morons is what they want

[–] tal@lemmy.today 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

aww goddammit what did RFK jr. come up with now?

This is apparently a Hegseth thing.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Or this is their collective stupid idea, about the same as handing out Pervitin.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago

its actually by hesgeth, hes obsessed with the t level of men.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Low testosterone is by no means a rare thing.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago

petey probably has low T himself, and he needs to "inspect" all these men.