this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
261 points (99.6% liked)

196

17640 readers
1156 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] clif@lemmy.world 67 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Fun fact, they short changed the horse:

Over a short period of time, they calculate, a horse can exert up to 14.9 horsepower.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 56 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wasn't horse power intended to represent the average energy output of a horse over a working day, rather than a brief maximum?

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 23 points 2 years ago

Yes, it was.

[–] MudMan@kbin.social 53 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

OK, just to sanity check, because it's not clear from the comments below.

We all realize that metric areas do use hp for car engines as well, right?

And a lot of them also do inches for TVs, which is weird and forces you to go digging into the specs for the cm measurements whenever you want to see if a TV will fit in a space.

EDIT: Oh, I'm wondering now, do people use liters/cc for engine volumes in the US? I don't know, but I also haven't ever heard of a different way to refer to engine volume ever, so they must. What would they use instead?

EDIT 2: For my money the most annoying unit conversion in car measurements is the US going for miles per gallon, keeping the volume of fuel constant and giving you the distance while metric uses liters per 100km, keeping the distance and giving you the volume of fuel. It may as well be impossible to convert between the two.

[–] BluesF@feddit.uk 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In the UK we use metric and imperial so you can buy things in kilos but also measure your efficiency in MPG. Welcome to the island of the future/past.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago

somewhere jacob rees mogg just let out a sob

[–] Fonderthud@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Engine displacement is measured in liters or cc as standard. Harley Davidson demands in using cubic inches though.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Its just the old air cooled dinosaur old-man Harleys that show their engines in cubic inches. Here's a 975cc Harley. Here is a 750cc Harley. The sportsters have been listed in cc's for decades.

Suzuki does it too, on their cruisers. Like the M109.

[–] MudMan@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I didn't know that and it is hilarious.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Its also incorrect for about half the bikes harley makes...

And don't look too closely at cruisers from Suzuki.

[–] Still@programming.dev 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

we have to dig to the specs for tv size cuz the size of tvs is the diagonal screen area not the actual size

we use cubic centimeter for small displacement engines where the whole displacement is measured (is car) and cubic inches for the large ones where the displacement is measured per cylinder (ie trains)

yup, reciprocal area measurements are a pain

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 38 points 2 years ago (2 children)

My electric vehicle, when set to imperial, will display charging speed in horsepower.

Apparently a wall outlet can provide 3.2 horsepower.

[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 20 points 2 years ago

Checks out, that's 2,610 watts, or about a 20A circuit at 120V.

[–] vanderbilt@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 8 points 2 years ago

Giving me horsepower for the motor output instead of kilowatts kind of makes sense, but it changes everywhere.

The battery just displays as a percentage, otherwise it might tell me the energy remaining in horsepower hours.

[–] SuperSpruce@lemmy.ml 35 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's 149KW (200hp) on that tiny car? That sounds like a hoot to drive

[–] Skua@kbin.social 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The Fortwo never got anywhere near that much power, not even the Brabus versions. Toyota did make a one-off version of the similarly-sized Aygo called the Aygo Crazy which really did have 200hp and RWD though, so the idea did actually come into being at least once

[–] notepass@feddit.de 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Man I wanna drive one of those on the autobahn. Probably would take on a Porsche or something with that weight to power ratio.

[–] msage@programming.dev 8 points 2 years ago

And then fly away when the wind picks up

[–] png@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Skua@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

That thing must be terrifying to drive

[–] EmergMemeHologram@startrek.website 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Ironic.

The American truck complaining that the EU is too regulated, while in the US something as simple as headlights are so overregulated they blind people while driving.

In the EU the headlights simply aim their lights away from incoming traffic automatically, which was a crime in the US until like last year.

[–] Hubi@feddit.de 16 points 2 years ago

In the EU the headlights simply aim their lights away from incoming traffic automatically, which was a crime in the US until like last year.

That only works like half the times at best. I'm still constantly getting my eyes lasered by big ass SUVs while driving at night. Not even counting the people that have misadjusted headlights.

[–] korewa@reddthat.com 3 points 2 years ago

Which cars do these now in the US?

[–] Granixo@feddit.cl 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Ok, i'm gonna be that guy.

Newton meters (Nm) is a measure of torque.

While horse power (HP) is a measure of engine power.

You obviously cannot convert one into the other because they mean different things.

Also, when EVs eventually become the mayority, the kilowatt (kW) is gonna take over as the new standard for measuring engine power.

[–] Skua@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago

Joules actually are Newton-metres, in a sense. A joule is (genuinely) defined as the work done when a 1 Newton force displaces a mass by one metre. So as long as you're willing to risk the Bureau international des poids et mesures assassinating you for your physics crimes, you can totally pretend that Newton-metres are for measuring energy and Nm/s is a reasonable way to measure power. While you're at it, you should measure torque in Coulomb-volts for the same reason

[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 8 points 2 years ago

N*m/s, not Nm. That's energy in joules. Still not power (J/s, which can convert to HP) though...

[–] Venat0r@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

I think that's the joke: Americans don't care about efficency, only power.

[–] glibg10b@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

1 Nm/s = 1 watt. It's a measure of power, not force

[–] spicystraw@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So is horsepower, whats your point?

[–] glibg10b@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] spicystraw@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Ah, thats true, didn`t read the meme properly the first time.

[–] DrCatface@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

sorry pocket reply

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thing is, one horse tops out at about 15 horsepower of force.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

15 ANSI horses, or 15 ISO horses?

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

It's a waste to make a 500hp truck when you could make two 250hp trucks instead

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 years ago

Op truck because one horse is up to 15hp. That truck would be 7500hp 💀

[–] threethan@reddthat.com 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I made this as a total shitpost but I'm loving the informative comments. Godwin's law at its finest.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago

congress should introduce all bills originally as shitposts

[–] Venat0r@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Wow, that truck must have about ~~7,450hp~~ 2,850hp ! 😲

[–] ThePJN@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Bah! Most people have never even seen a horse. I never would have, had we not been dragged to see the pervert horse ballet when it came to town.

[–] FeeshyFish@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago
[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A fellow PHB enjoyer, I see!

[–] ThePJN@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

See! This freak gets it!

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago