this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
522 points (100.0% liked)

196

18462 readers
77 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Slinky5737 72 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Is Wendy's still doing the sassy Twitter (now known as "X, formerly known as Twitter") schtick?

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I believe it's called Ten now. X was too edgy.

[–] kismattic@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It’s Threads, not better than mastodon but still better than Twitter, or at least I hope?

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They mean twitter is called Ten, because X is 10.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

...for context, Apple used to be very particular about pronouncing it “mack oh-as ten”. There is somewhat of a reason behind this, nobody will pronounce SuperBowl ⅩⅬⅧ as “eks-el-vee-triple-eye”.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

It's Macintosh Oh-Ass Ex and I will never change.

[–] Maultasche@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I played enough fighting games to know it's "Cross".

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago

If you hate yourself, open threads. It’s 90% Wendy’s ads.

[–] kismattic@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

Yes! But now they’re also on Threads, I would’ve put this on Mastodon if they existed there

[–] jettrscga@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

What the shit do they call "tweets" now?

Any name I think of sounds like an abomination from hell.

"Xeets"?

"Xits"?

"Musk droppings"?

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 49 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Threads, social media for people who wish it was mostly Wendy’s ads.

[–] kismattic@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Yeah it’s definitely bloated with companies just trying to act witty or like they’re people. Mastodon is infinitely better in that respect. Ive just been dumb trying to get more outreach for the social stuff I’ve been trying to do 😣

[–] xusontha@ls.buckodr.ink 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] kismattic@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

$5.35 after taxes. I just want answers on why it’s wrong and Wendy’s will never answer me 🥲

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

In your county. Taxes here (Sacramento, California) are 8.75%

Not that we'd begrudge a few pennies from a Wendy's purchase.

You don't get to keep your 4 for $4 marketing when you raise it to $5. It smacks of capitalism desperation.

[–] kismattic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah I’d be fine if it were just the tax, but literally marketing something one way and charging a 25% markup is just false advertising. Either change the name of the deal or change the price.

Am I petty for making such a fuss about $1, hell yeah, but is it annoying that “value” meals from every major fast food chain are going up while keeping the same name/title, absolutely

[–] Masamune@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

4 for $4*

*per menu item

[–] RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

So, is it that number 4 is supposed to be $4 or that you order 4 number 4's and only have to pay $4?

[–] kismattic@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Haha sorry if the title is confusing. The meal is supposed to be those specific 4 items that you pay $4. Guess it would read more correctly as “4 for $4” but I was dumb and said for $5 since their pricing is deceptive. (Sorry if you’re just making a joke and it whooshed over my head 😅)

[–] burgermeister@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

It's four for four fores for forever fours fore.