this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
443 points (96.4% liked)

News

30613 readers
3766 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aidinthel@reddthat.com 91 points 2 years ago (3 children)

“I don’t want them to advertise,” Musk said at the New York Times DealBook Summit in New York. “If someone is going to blackmail me with advertising or money go fk yourself. Go. Fk. Yourself,” he said.

Some people think being wealthy proves that a person is smarter than everyone else or has some special skill that makes them more valuable to society. Then there's the richest man in the world who thinks it's a good idea to curse out his company's primary source of revenue.

[–] Kittengineer@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

lol of course he thinks the companies are “blackmailing him” and not that the companies don’t want to advertise in the cesspool he has turned twitter into.

Even if you didn’t like twitter before, it’s much worse now than Elon has worked his magic. Why would companies want to pay money to have their brands side by side with nazi posts.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

It's the "free market in action" when we're forced to keep a job for healthcare, pay for things like food and rent.

But it's "blackmail" when it's against a billionaire's company.

Huh.

[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But the market never misallocates resources and if it does its the evil gubments fault! -some plutocratic sycophant

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

“Something something damn regulations, something something taxation is theft!”

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

I'm willing to bet xitter have some unofficial sources of revenue. Foreign sources.

[–] Xariphon@kbin.social 52 points 2 years ago (3 children)

How evil do you have to be to be too evil for Walmart?

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 29 points 2 years ago

Walmart does what is good for walmart profits.

Having walmart adds placed next to Nazi shit is not good for walmart profits. (and then the public finding out, which is the real problem)

So walmart pulls adds from twitter.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Lmao, oh, my, no… this isn’t a moral stance they’re taking… hehehe… oh, sigh

No, they’re protecting their profits. At least some of their customers object and it might affect Walmart’s bottom line, so that’s why they’re pulling their ads. They don’t give a shit about the content on Twitter, or they would have stopped advertising there long ago.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

That's the point of a business.

[–] interceder270@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Crazy how people like you think Walmart is any more or less evil than the average for-profit corporation.

[–] Xariphon@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They're definitely more evil than average, the average is just also pretty fuckin' evil.

[–] interceder270@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

How are they more evil than average? What does Walmart do that Target, Whole Foods, and Kroger does not?

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 41 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’m looking forward to seeing how the MAGA Wal Mart boycott plays out.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I'm sure General Dollar will rise to the challenge and once again stand with the troops.

[–] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 39 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They pulled ads back in October, according to their statement in the article, so it seems to me like this is more a sign of how big companies are no longer seeing X as being worth the money to advertise there.

[–] Rediphile@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 years ago (2 children)

And it has literally nothing to do with ethics and is profit driven. The entire point of advertising is to make money.

[–] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 21 points 2 years ago

And the fact that they did this in October and no one noticed until now says they made the right choice. They weren’t getting enough eyes on their ads anymore and quietly dropped them.

I bet a lot of the companies that dropped advertising on X were already planning to do so before Elon opened his big mouth.

[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is this like the opposite of "go woke go broke"? It sure seems like you lose more money being a hate monger as a public company, or maybe that's just Musk?

[–] interceder270@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Red states are the poorest. "Get woke go broke" was always bullshit.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I hope both Twitter and Wal Mart fail.

[–] DietBajaBlast@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What in the world would ever make you think Walmart would “fail”?

[–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean to be fair they only said they hope.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Apply the same critique to anything someone hopes.

I hope Santa brings me a bike this year!

I hope my cancer goes into remission.

I hope I get to see them in heaven someday.

[–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The presence of hope doesn't necessarily mean the person believes their statement is going to happen though. On the tangent of Walmart, I hope Amazon Fails too :).

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

No I’m just saying it’s a funny thing to say to someone saying “I hope” I think hope’s just an unrealistic distraction, but I also hope big box stores get collapsed.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Probably one where Amazon overtakes them.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Nah, America's gonna wake up and overthrow our oppressors any day now.

Surely before they destroy the environment beyond hope of redemption.

[–] rab@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm more pessimistic in that I think due to social media a revolution is almost impossible because people are now unable to agree on a mutual goal

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

This made me lol but it is something I fantasize about

[–] interceder270@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

0% chance of happening. Amazon is on the downturn, Walmart is not.

[–] interceder270@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Why would you want the grocery store with the best deals and largest presence outside of major cities to fail?

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because, while they do provide low prices to consumers. They are absolutely evil to their employees. And source inventory from extremely evil companies (i e. Slave and child labor)...

[–] interceder270@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

What about Target, Whole Foods, Kroger, etc? Are they exempt from what you're accusing Walmart of?

[–] BWchief117@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I hope MAGAs try to cancel WalMart next...

[–] ugh@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

They're going to run out of options

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Has there been any analysis on what impact Musk's clear attempt to sabotage Twitter has on electorate engagement in elections?

Because here's my thought: X is becoming a right-wing extremist echo-chamber. A safe space for bigotry. So while reasonable eyes leave, the mold festers largely unchecked.

So going to past elections, was Twitter a greater driver for turning out Democratic voters, or Republican ones? I am genuinely curious.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I feel like that's what's happened with school boards and other such. The reasonable people who used to be in charge were badgered until they gave up in disgust and now all the fuckfaces took over.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

The exact same strategy has been and continues to be at play with election officials at every level of government. So many election workers have been harassed so much that especially in lieu of the pay and lack of security they don't consider it worth it. So then naturally the nazis fill these spots.