this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
219 points (89.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

62732 readers
255 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A lot of my files were shitty 480p versions of movies from the Napster days. Now they're all 1080p, with a few 720p exceptions (mainly tv series episodes). All in all 500 something files in total. Now just watching uTorrent slowly download them all. Hopefully my VPN keeps the eyes off of me...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Romanmir@lemmy.today 215 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You re-downloaded your media to get better quality files.

I re-downloaded my media because I misconfigured Radarr.

We are not the same.

[–] Romanmir@lemmy.today 19 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Also, pro-tip: When configuring Radarr (or Sonarr for that matter), be sure to define a recycle bin.

I woke up the next morning with all my media wiped. That was in June/July. I'm still recovering.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] drunkensailor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 107 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (11 children)

Now just watching uTorrent slowly download them all. Hopefully my VPN keeps the eyes off of me…

  1. qbittorrent is better in many many ways compared to utorrent and hasa very similar interface. qbit is open-source, utorrent isn't. qbit doesn't have ads or malware, utorrent has or has had both many times. qbit allows you to bind to a specific network interface (e.g. you VPN connection instead of regular ethernet one) which offer better protection if your vpn drops. feel free to do your own research here or elsewhere on the web if you doubt any of my points.
  2. if your VPN is a free one, that wont protect you at all. those guys will squeal and turn over server logs with ip address at the drop of a hat. Even a lot of paid-for VPNs are shitty lying bastards. So picking a good vpn can be challenging there are probably posts here covering recommendations but generally you want ones that have either been taken to court and were unable to provide logs OR ones that have been audited by a respected 3rd party firm that can confirm they are truly a "no log VPN". I can recommend PIA, NordVPN, and Mullvad as some ones that are highly unlikely to turn over any logs (bc they don't have them) but there are others and doing your own research isn't a bad thing. The site torrentfreak.com does an article once a year or so that covers a few of the more popular VPNs and different aspects of thier privacy but they don't declare a "best vpn", just rate them on varius privacy and security aspects.
  3. Even if you have a good VPN, check that you aren't leaking your real IP via dns lookups: ipleak.net or dnsleaktest.com
  4. Check that you torrent client set up not to leak: search for 'torrent ip leak test' and do one of the torrent ip leak tests. ipleak.net hasone of these if you scroll down on the page; look for "Torrent Address detection" and click "Activate" button and it will give a magnet link to start test with
  5. additionally, you can set up a "vpn killswitch" to prevent traffic from going over regular internet if you vpn drops. If you using qbit, this probably isn't strictly required but many people here like to have this as an additional safety. i can't really provide details on this bc the process varies widely. A lot of VPN client apps have this feature built in. But even if they don't, you can set something like this up in most firewalls but exact steps will vary depending on OS (Windows/Linux/Mac) and which firewall you are using (or I guess whether or not you even have one installed).
[–] solitude@lemmy.one 28 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

you can set up a “vpn killswitch” ...... A lot of VPN client apps have this feature built in.

Most quality VPNs will have a killswitch built in and enabled automatically, with nothing to setup, but they are notoriously unreliable and can fail. The key term people want to search for is "bind." You want to bind qBit to your VPN. If your VPN isn't working, qBit doesn't have a connection. Most decent, privacy first, "no log" VPNs (Mullvad, Proton, AirVPN, iVPN, etc.) will provide instructions on binding. This is above and beyond their built-in killswitch.

I can recommend PIA, NordVPN

I'm not saying you shouldn't recommend these, or that people shouldn't use them, but IMO, people should at least be warned to search for the following, so they can make an informed decision:

  1. “kape technologies malware” (Kape owns Private Internet Access, which is why I switched to Mullvad years ago when Kape bought PIA)
  2. "nordvpn data breach"
[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 7 points 2 years ago (7 children)

NordVPN also doesn't have port forwarding so you're unlikely to be able to seed anything back. This'll get you banned from private trackers and goes against the whole concept of torrenting.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] drunkensailor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

Most quality VPNs will have a killswitch built in and enabled automatically, with nothing to setup, but they are notoriously unreliable and can fail.

Fair. I do all of my setup manually these days (networkmanager on linux, openvpn client app on the rare occasion i'm on windows, not a mac guy so no clue there). I implement one using a firewall but that is more complex than most people want. Still, as long as it is done in addition to the qbit network interface bind, then it's not bad to also set a VPN killswitch.

The key term people want to search for is “bind.” You want to bind qBit to your VPN.

Agreed. This is what I was referencing in the first bullet about network interface

I’m not saying you shouldn’t recommend these, or that people shouldn’t use them, but IMO, people should at least be warned to search for the following, so they can make an informed decision:

1 - Fair points. TBH, I had my doubts about that initially but have been with them the whole time (before and after kape acquisition). FWIW, I have not seen any change in PIA service quality. In fact, I have seen them add Wireguard support and release all of the code as FOSS (see here). I agree that Kape did some sketchy shit in the past but from what I have seen over the last several years, they are not doing anything sketchy in the VPN/technology sector part of their business (aside from maybe advertising which I consider to be separate). I don't even really think about Kape anymore tbh. If they were ratting me out, I would have had enough dcma notices to start a bonfire with by now.

2 - I had not been aware of that. I haven't used them in a few years. Any sort of data breach definitely sounds bad but since I haven't reviewed the details, I don't want to jump to any conclusions either.

I like Mullvad from a tech and privacy standpoint but IMO they are a bit on the expensive side compared to some of the other options. Nord and PIA you can usually get multiyear deals on periodically and that can drastically lower the overall cost ($80 for a 3yr VPN plan = monthly about 2.22 USD/2.04 euro vs 5 euro/month for mullvad). Not saying price is the be-all-end-all or that Mullvad is unaffordable but it is going to be a consideration for many, especially people that already don't want to shell out for a paid VPN over the free ones. With that in mind, I think there is still value in PIA (and possibly Nord - I haven't reviewed the details of what exactly was breached - e.g. vpn service vs blog server vs etc, what data was exposed, what steps they took to address, etc). There are many other no-logs vpn options besides Nord, PIA, and Mullvad out there, I just don't have any personal experience with them.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Greyfoxsolid@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Excellent info. Thank you!

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 65 points 2 years ago (3 children)

People still use that malware of a client???

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

uTorrent 2.2.1 Build 25154 is good. There's a few builds of uTorrent that are fine.

But yeah, qbittorrent is the default "why didn't you use it?" client.

[–] Redhotkurt@kbin.social 17 points 2 years ago

It's good in the sense that it's the last version before it got enshittified by ads, but the now nearly-legendary v2.2.1 is also 5 years behind in security patches. It was an awesome, fast, stable client and I miss it, but I don’t think it's worth the risk. Like you and everyone else has been saying, OP should be using Qbittorent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Greyfoxsolid@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Which would your suggest? It's been a long time since I've had to do a little pirating.

[–] navi@lemmy.tespia.org 37 points 2 years ago (1 children)

qBitTorrent is one of the standard clients.

[–] Greyfoxsolid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thanks! I'll give it a go after this is all done downloading.

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago

Tixati, Deluge and Transmission are also good, modern clients

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Radar and sonarr would just automatically upgrade those for you. No need to mass delete and redownload.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] GutsBerserk@lemmy.world 40 points 2 years ago (4 children)

You have triggered me by mentioning uTorrent.

[–] Greyfoxsolid@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

My apologies. I'll be discontinuing it's use after this project is done.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Hubi@feddit.de 40 points 2 years ago (8 children)

You really shouldn't use uTorrent. There are a number of safer and better open source alternatives out there.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] theKalash@feddit.ch 33 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Pretty easy to do with just 500 fies. That's just 2/3 of the Simpsons.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] 7h0m4s@aussie.zone 30 points 2 years ago
[–] FlavoredButtHair@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (16 children)

Should probably switch to qbtorrent. What VPN are you using?

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Waluigis_Talking_Buttplug@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

I raw dog my torrents with no VPN

Can someone tell me the actual risks involved? I always thought it was so you didn't get your ISP up your ass and shut you off, my power company is my ISP and they don't give a shit

What really am I risking here?

Edit: US

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 39 points 2 years ago

Depends where you live. In some countries nothing. In other countries fines. In some death penalty.

[–] Koordinator_O@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago

Me, Germany, 20 years of no VPN = nothing ever happend Friend of me, also germany, downloads Minecraft once without VPN = 800€ cease and desist letter So yeah. Pretty much a gamble.

[–] SeatBeeSate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

One of three things, one your ISP doesn't give a shit and nothing happens. Two, you get nasty-grams telling you to cease or have your service cut, three your information gets forwarded to the copyright owners company and you possibly are fined or worse brought in by a lawsuit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] notepass@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago

Depends on where you are. Depending on country it can range from no one giving a shit, over to getting letters from your ISP, over to getting smaller fines, up to getting railed for your life.

[–] SternburgExport@feddit.de 17 points 2 years ago (4 children)

And all of that wouldnt be possible if you legally purchased all of this

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Faceman2K23@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (16 children)

Sonarr/Radarr will do this for you automagically for most TV and Movies, never have to visit a dodgy torrent site again.

Started setting it up years ago and over time re-downloaded all those shitty yify rips with full fat bluray remuxes wherever available and the highest quality possible otherwise. Hit 100tb pretty quickly lol.

I have my rig set up to automatically upgrade to bluray remuxes when available, then once they are older than 1 month and over a certain filesize they get automatically compressed with a fairly slow, low crf H265-10bit encode with FileFlows to cut their size roughly in half while still being visually perfect on the normal TVs, all 4k content stays untouched for the main theatre.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

that would take me awhile. im up to ~30,000 episodes of 'shows' and 2,500 movies

ive been recently doing the same..grabbing the 4k versions of stuff that matters.

my fav config is gluetun+deluge for a containerized seedbox

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] burliman@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Don’t radarr and sonarr download better versions automatically? Seems these measures were drastic.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I’m keeping my original pirates of Mr. Robot for posterity

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›