this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023

73 points (92.9% liked)

Games

38929 readers

769 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

!gaming@Lemmy.world: Our sister community, focused on PC and console gaming. Meme are allowed.
!photomode@feddit.uk: For all your screenshots needs, to share your love for games graphics.
!vgmusic@lemmy.world: A community to share your love for video games music

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

!JeuxVideo@jlai.lu: French

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Dremor@lemmy.world

JonsJava@lemmy.world

fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Dremor@jlai.lu

modfxomt@lemmy.world

EA opens up more patents for increasing Accessibility in gaming (www.gamingonlinux.com)

submitted 2 years ago by DannyMac@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world

18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Alternate headline: "EA did a good thing in latest attempt to get off naughty list"

all 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] kubica@kbin.social 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

A yes, patents is what will help accessibility.

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 63 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

this is opening up patents, so yes, in a world like ours having something be patented, but royalty free and anyone can use is much better than the alternative. which is either one company owning it and licencing it. or a patent troll getting it and making it even worse.

the sarcasm in this case, is not warranted. this is a good thing.

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The better alternative would be to not patent it in the first place.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 47 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Then a patent troll steals it and makes things worse for everyone.

Patenting something then immediately opening it up is by far the best option.

[+] Poayjay@lemmy.world -9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

That’s literally not a thing. Once something is publicly disclosed it can’t be patented (unless it is by the discloser during the one year grace period). You can’t take someone else’s invention and patent it. If someone does you can invalidate their patent without even a lawyer. If you want something you invent to be free for everyone the best thing you can do is get it out into the world and not patent it.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You're not supposed to. That doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

Nobody wants to spend the court costs to get a patent troll stripped of their bad patent. And for a patent troll you're going to need a lawyer, they're going to fight tooth and nail to keep it since that's their source of income.

[–] Poayjay@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Once again, this is not true. They do what is called a prior art search as part of issuing a patent. They look worldwide for anything that could be considered your invention before your filing date before issuing a patent. Even after a patent is issued, if prior art is presented to the patent office they can rescind the patent. It’s a form and like $100. You don’t need a lawyer to bring prior art to the patent office’s attention. The legal battle will be between the patent office and the patent troll if they are trying to contest the prior art.

[–] Perroboc@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh boy are you wrong. Check out the patents to polio vaccines, or Volvos three point seatbelt.

[–] Poayjay@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What? There was no polio vaccine patent. The inventor literally did exactly what I suggested. He made his work freely available so that it could not be patented. Volvo made a business decision to make their patent freely usable and we are still talking about it. Their brand has been permanently associated with safety because of it.

[–] Perroboc@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Exactly! They tried to patent it, but it didn’t meet the requirements (https://www.ipeg.com/jonas-salk-inventor-of-the-polio-vaccine-could-you-patent-the-sun).

Notice how they tried to patent it “to prevent companies from making unlicensed, low-quality versions of the vaccine. There is no sign that the foundation intended to profit from a patent on the polio vaccine.”

EDIT: and on the other hand, you get things like insulin, where the patent was sold for $1 (https://www.vox.com/2019/4/3/18293950/why-is-insulin-so-expensive)

[–] GorgeousDumpsterFire@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

...leaving the idea unclaimed for someone else to patent instead? Strange take.

The patent system is far from perfect, but patents themselves are necessary. EA had an idea, they had the right to patent it. They had the right to keep the patent closed, instead they opted to open it.

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You can't patent something that already exists.

[–] GorgeousDumpsterFire@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If the idea already existed EA wouldn't have been issued the patent. That's part of the process of obtaining the patent.

Point is moot because the patent was issued.

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 1 points 2 years ago

My point is if they created something without patenting it, it is no longer possible for anyone to patent it.

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

these things often do not exist yet, hence the patent

[–] hydroel@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Doesn't "opening up patents" means that anyone can use the ideas behind the patent without charge? Which means that it's actually not locked anymore, so yes it does help?

[–] TheFerrango@lemmy.basedcount.com 12 points 2 years ago

Finally, people with disabilities can experience loot boxes, ads and DLCs at no extra cost

[–] Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Maybe they do it because of an increasing risk of getting challenged in court and causing a patent law re-evaluation, which would hurt them for other patents. I don't think EA does something because of good will.