this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
744 points (99.1% liked)

politics

23703 readers
2594 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Yes. You read that right. Johnson is saying that he is intentionally hiding insurrectionists from prosecution in the release of tapes that Republicans claim will vindicate them on January 6th.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fubo@lemmy.world 222 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That'd be a confession to treason, then.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 33 points 2 years ago

Right???? What the hell?

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 149 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Far-right Republicans like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) and former President Donald Trump have praised Johnson’s promise to release the footage, saying it will “prove” that the activities of Jan. 6, 2021, were peaceful.

Only morons and guilty people believe this. I saw evidence to the contrary on live broadcast.

[–] chowder@lemmy.one 104 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Someone was peacefully trampled to death, Ashley Babbitt was peacefully shot breaking into the capitol, and those were gallows of peace.

[–] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

They literally dragged a security guard out of the door and ~~beat him to death~~. Because of all the preconditions that the seditionists set up, there were few guards and they didn't escalate. It saved their lives at least, but it was corrupt to the core

[–] Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I think you're confusing Michael Fanone (dragged out, tased and beaten, had a heart attack but survived) with Brian Sicknick (had a stroke late that night and died the next day). To my knowledge, Sicknick wasn't involved in any assault that is believed to have caused his death.

(Before anyone jumps down my throat, I think all the Jan 6th rioters are traitors. I just think it's important to be accurate.)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Breaking outside windows to gain access, etc.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 39 points 2 years ago

I was gonna say, we watched the events play out live on both news and social media. Peaceful protestors don't scale the walls of the capitol building, bulldoze baracades, and threaten capitol police, all while chanting stop the steal.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago

That’s like saying a school shooting was peaceful because over 99.9% of people weren’t being violent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 94 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Half the country takes their bullshit seriously.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not half of the country. Remember that Trump lost the popular vote.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Not even half of the voters.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 93 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Wouldn’t the DOJ have already seen this footage. Why would Congress have access to security footage that the cops don’t have already have access to?

This smells like some sort of play for time and or a way for GOP leaders to pretend to have their base’s backs.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 2 years ago

Yup, it’s just theatre. Their idiot base will eat it right up too, because they are hateful idiots.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 81 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why would you have to blur the faces of people doing nothing illegal or wrong?

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So they're not still claiming they were FBI plants or Antifa?

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Fuck it, at this point the GOP thinks they were peaceful Antifa Trump-supporting FBI Agents Provacateur.

Or something.

[–] Heresy_generator@kbin.social 77 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"We have to obstruct justice"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 72 points 2 years ago

Speaker Johnson implicates House GOP in conspiracy to obstruct justice and commits high treason along the way

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 64 points 2 years ago

Obstruction of justice

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 55 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Pikachu face when we unblur them with AI & send another 600 of his #fascist supporters to Federal prison.

BTW, #Jan6th has been adjudicated as an insurrection, twice. This is quite literally giving aid & comfort to enemies of the USA.

[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Cross ref blurred faces with unblurred media footage - Voilà! You have your perps.

Edit: Spelling. Lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 38 points 2 years ago

Criminals all from the top down.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Wait, can someone get his son on the horn to see if this is some kind of Japanese porn blur fetish thing?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

see for themselves what happened that day, rather than having to rely upon the interpretation of a small group of government officials.

Dude, just stop.

I live on the opposite side of the Atlantic Ocean and I clearly saw many laws being broken via a live internet stream. Everyone in the world with the opportunity who cared and/or fretted enough did.

Jericho Johnson is trying to change what the world has already seen clearly INTO the alternative reality interpretation of a small group of government officials.

[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago

So, obstruction of justice.

[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago

I remember when many GOP lawmakers were reliving what happened on 1/6, and talking about how Trump almost got THEM killed, and I thought finally, we were going to see some action, thought they would finally have Trump cooked. So naive, I was.

I fully believe it has to do with Project2025. They want it so bad they are willing to die for it, and in all likelihood even kill for it.

[–] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago

They have to blur the faces to keep the public from helping identify them and thus help the DoJ.

[–] PeckerBrown@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago

Fucking traitor.

[–] tiita@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (5 children)

How come excrements like this get to sit as the speaker of the house is beyond me

Something is seriously wrong with the world

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

The RepubliQan Party don’ need no steenking badges

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sooooo, the party of "law and order" wants to hide the faces of LAW BREAKERS? Yeah, fuck no, go fuck yourself. How can anyone support this shit? If you support this, you're either a fucking criminal or a piece of shit. No in between.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

So he is going to release fabricated evidence at best and tampered evidence at worst. Way to go GOP!

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

"We have to blur some of the faces to ~~protect them from the DOJ~~ obstruct justice."

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Forget the fact that the DOJ already has the tapes and this dude is just signalling to Republican voters, why would it be the purview of the Speaker of the House to obstruct DOJ investigations and admit to it publicly?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Also, why is it up to this weird little man (and total asshole), anyway?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

We’re working steadily on it. We’ve hired additional personnel to do that

I wonder what the hourly rate of a GOP Face Blurrer/Justice Obstructor is. I bet the dollar number is smaller than the maximum number of years in prison they would each be facing if the DOJ was still allowed to pursue justice..

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

That would be a perfect reason to get rid of him: If that is not "giving aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States" as laid out in paragraph 3 of amendment 14, what would one need to do to achieve that status?

I hope one day justice will be done to the Republicans.

[–] DigitalFrank@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

DOJ already has the unblurred tapes. They are blurring faces to hide the Feds.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] firewyre@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

ARE YOU FUCKING SHITTING ME

[–] TheJims@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Taxpayer funded obstruction of justice and whitewashing

load more comments
view more: next ›