this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
199 points (99.0% liked)

Games

40037 readers
1016 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 37 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Does anyone know why it's so expensive there?

[–] Sabin10@lemmy.world 60 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lack of net neutrality is a huge part of it. Korean ISPs bill sites like twitch for the data they use.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 years ago

This is good ammo for the fight for Net Neutrality, honestly.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 45 points 2 years ago (1 children)

IIRC, South Korea charges an import tax for foreign media. It’s part of why Korea has become a sort of media powerhouse, with K-pop, K-dramas, K-comics, etc… Those things are much cheaper in SK because they’re all local and aren’t being charged that extra tax. So they’re naturally very popular in SK because they’re much cheaper. Sort of a positive feedback loop where the media is cheaper so people consume more of it, which makes the media popular enough to survive on its own outside of Korea as well.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 61 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's not about media or taxes, it's about inflated fees for traffic period. It's regulatory capture (which Korea has a long history of) and subsequent collusion by Korean ISPs. Prohibitively expensive to run a streaming service like that even if you have local datacenters to reduce international transit fees (because you still have to connect to the local ISPs who will still charge you). https://carnegieendowment.org/2021/08/17/afterword-korea-s-challenge-to-standard-internet-interconnection-model-pub-85166

Edit: To be clear, this sort of situation is about the only one where to effectively have a streaming service, you'd need to use peer to peer and make it "come from inside the house", so to speak. Even their local streaming services are over the barrel and only the ISPs themselves could actually make an affordable streaming service.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

SPNP - Sending Network Party Pays
The party that creates the traffic pays the operating costs.

[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Damn I didn’t know it was 10x the cost. Crazy how a company that size still can’t handle the fees.

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 43 points 2 years ago (3 children)

more a matter of “don’t wanna” than “can’t”

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It says they operated at a loss in SK. If that's true, I wouldn't wanna, either.

[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I also didn’t know that South Korea charges extra for foreign content providers which is also pretty aggressive.

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 years ago

Yeah, and it all started from a lawsuit between SK Telecom and Netflix because in 2020 people watching Squid Games in Korea used an unprecedented amount of bandwidth. Reuters article

Most telecom providers make deals with the big platforms regarding payment, but I guess S. Korea really wants Afreeca to be the only player in the streaming space. It could also be chaebol shenanigans.

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There's no "don't wanna" unless there's a "can't" due to not being able to make a profit. If they could they would. It's simple as that.

[–] PrettyLights@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Companies don't just want to make a profit, they want to make the largest profit. Plenty of businesses turn down profitable ventures in pursuit of more lucrative returns.

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why would they do that if they aren't mutually exclusive to one another? I'd get this notion if they'd started to do some sort of alternate way of providing for the SK market where their original platform would have been in the way but why close off profitable branches for no reason at all?

[–] PrettyLights@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Because an organization or person only has so much bandwidth and attention. You can't infinitely scale to grab every bit of profit.

"Tripping over dollars to pick up pennies."

[–] Chailles@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

While true, that's not exactly relevant when it's a choice between losing a lot of money and not losing a lot of money.

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

10x the cost of what tho? They just say "most other countries", but tahts just spin and essentially meaningless without more data

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

That is surprising forthcoming from them.

[–] Desistance@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Couldn't Koreans just VPN to another country?

[–] Konraddo@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

No need. Asian countries are not blocked from using Twitch. It's just Twitch won't have local business in Korea now.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

VPNs aren't the solution to shitty laws, nor can you expect that to be a valid mass solution

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This’ll probably happen, anyone wanting to watch or stream on Twitch will probably just go through the Japanese servers. But Twitch isn’t that popular in Korea anyways, most of the Korea-based streamers on the platform have large foreign audiences.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What's funny is Korean VPNs would be paying the fees to the ISPs instead, lol. ISPs still get their money.

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 4 points 2 years ago

Which would be passed to their customers in the form of more expensive VPN price. Either way, the ISPs are the winner here, and I think someone mentioned that it's practically impossible to create a new ISP due to regulatory capture so there will be no competition to challenge the oligopoly.