this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
94 points (100.0% liked)

worldnews

5286 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil. Disagreements happen, that does not give you the right to personally insult each other.

  2. No racism or bigotry.

  3. Posts from sources that aren't known to be incredibly biased for either side of the spectrum are preferred. If this is not an option, you may post from whatever source you have as long as it is relevant to this community.

  4. Post titles should be the same as the article title.

  5. No spam, self-promotion, or trolling.

Instance-wide rules always apply.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] athos77@kbin.social 49 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Resolution 377 allows the UN body to take action whenever there was an indication that the UN Security Council may have failed to “exercise its primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security”.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago

The wikipedia is interesting, I didn't know it was called that many times

I'm a little unclear on which ones were successful but it looks like a few were?

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago

Fact that Mauritania is the cosigner makes me think Egypt just wanted anyone at all to go along with them so they can basically threaten Israel under UN sanction

I'd be shocked if it worked, mostly because escalation at this point is immediately going to ignite like 50 different proxy, civil, and interstate wars as KSA and Iran throw all the shit straight into the fan playing then counterplaying each other and taking their attention off secondary conflicts until we somethefuckhow wind up with the war for greater Azerbaijan becoming a thing because Netenyahu thought starting an irredentist genocide was how he'd save himself from being dragged into the streets like a Likkud Ghadaffi over trying to rig the courts in retaliation for them pointing out that the current plans for Irredentist genocide were illegal even under Israeli law.

[–] fastandcurious@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What will they do to stop the US from vetoing once again?

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The US can veto the Security Council because the power is there in that smaller scenario. They can't override the entire UN General Assembly, though. That said, I'm sure there would be behind the scenes pressure from the US on allies voting in the GA.

I'm more concerned about the double standard of the White House skirting Congress to supply Israel with tank ammo (does Hamas even have equipment they'd use that against, you know, besides hospitals and schools,?) vs. allowing Republicans in Congress to delay/prevent aid to Ukraine and possibly hand it to Russia.

[–] fastandcurious@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

We the U.S. will make sure humanitarian and military aids will be given to the oppressed

~Butonlyifitmakesusmoney~

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

(does Hamas even have equipment they’d use that against, you know, besides hospitals and schools,?)

You forgot mosques and refugee shelters.

[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 12 points 2 years ago

There are no vetoes in the General Assembly