this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
143 points (98.6% liked)

World News

48454 readers
1967 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EfreetSK@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It has 230 ft, that's 70 m since we're in Europe

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I wonder what tonnage a vessel that size would be?

[–] Really_long_toes@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Probably a ship wreck

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Probably a ship sunk during WWI or WWII.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If that's the case, I'm surprised there is no historical record of the sinking, either from the country that owned it, or the one that sunk it.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


It was discovered 125 feet beneath the surface of the ocean in a portion of the Baltic Sea that had never been studied in detail prior to Ignitis Renewables' research, the company said.

Paulius Kalmantas, a spokesperson for Ignitis Renewables, said in a statement that Lithuanian authorities confirmed the company's find had not previously been marked in any national databases.

The company said additional historical and underwater archaeological research would help authorities learn more about the shipwreck, something Kalmantas said "will be valuable for the country's scientific community and historians."

"While carrying out research on the Baltic Sea floor for the offshore wind power park project, we have found a previously unknown sunken ship!"

Whether Lithuania will formally register the shipwreck in its national database of historically-significant places depends on the ongoing research, said Augustina Kurilienė, an official with the heritage department at the country's ministry of culture.

Archaeologist and heritage expert Elena Pranckėnaitė told the company the shipwreck can also be studied to understand more about the history of shipping in the Baltic Sea.


The original article contains 454 words, the summary contains 175 words. Saved 61%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] weeabooextract@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Aaahhhh...

Unternehmen Hannibal, good times.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What are those blocky things on top side?

[–] Cinner@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

That's a great question. They almost look like blocks, and one looks moved right by the wrecked ship. When was the last time the Baltic Sea was above sea level?

Possible artifacting if the surveying was done by 2 ships a certain distance from each other?

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

When was the last time the Baltic Sea was above sea level?

Only thing i know is that the british channel was created after thawing lakes at the end of the ice age flooded their way. Probably something similiar with the baltic sea. And before the ice age, there were no civilizations. And even before that, there was even deeper sea (before europe surfaced). So, probably never.

[–] Cinner@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Presumably not before the mini ice age ~12k years ago... you mean the full-blown ice age right.

(I don't know the proper terms of the eras sorry)

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 2 points 2 years ago

Yes, the big thing.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Btw, not to derail the point, but how do you embedd images instead of as link?

[–] Cinner@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Like this. I think the image also has to be on its own line.

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I believe the wrinkles that look like waves are the sand ground and it's deep under water and we don't see the water surface.

[–] Cinner@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I agree about the wave/wrinkle looking things. I'm talking about the block looking things above the ship, and one beside it that looks like it moved from above it. I'm not sure how Lemmy works across instances but I did add a picture to my comment.

[–] LifeCoffeeGaming@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

They found the Nautilus?