this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
1458 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

71623 readers
3513 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The users, and only users, need to be the shareholders. A bunch of useless venture capitalist parasites should never again be allowed to own and destroy our public spaces.

[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 34 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] thorbot@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (3 children)

"public"

If y'all stop investing your time and energy into private companies as if they're the public interest, we wouldn't have these issues.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheDeepState@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MrCrankyBastard@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago

Good. fuck'em.

[–] oDDmON@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Spez, self styled content king, screwed by own outsized ego and underwhelming intellect.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ahriboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)

2024 is literally a year of leaving Reddit for Lemmy.

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Because 2023 wasn't?

To elaborate: what Reddit did this year wasn't enough for a (major) mass migration. I very much doubt even more ads will deter those that have stuck around so far. Perhaps there'll be a trickle, but I don't see anything happening like what was the case for Digg back in the day.

[–] spudwart@spudwart.com 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

This will trigger an enshittification cycle.

    1. Underperformance per-quarter resulting in anti-user actions to increase profits.
    1. Users leave because of anti-user actions.
    1. Profits will decrease as users leave until the end of quarter.
    1. Return to Step 1.
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Reddit is going to be a prime short opportunity on IPO.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] manbeef@lemmy.whynotdrs.org 29 points 1 year ago
[–] HootinNHollerin@slrpnk.net 27 points 1 year ago

I’d rather not even see that cunts face

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Anyone here use reddit only for porn?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] DrGonzo@lemmynsfw.com 25 points 2 years ago

Smoke a massive bag of dicks spez

[–] middlemanSI@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago

Will nobody think of the infinite growth!?

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago

Smoke a turd, spez. 😘

[–] st3ph3n@kbin.social 24 points 2 years ago

Mandatory Fuck Spez comment

[–] sebinspace@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Remember when the IPO was supposed to be in 2021? Then it was 2022? 2023?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

that's what they get for perma-banning all their human users.

[–] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Since there's a paywall, I can't see the whole article but does this imply there was still positive ad growth and they just missed their goal or there was no or negative ad growth?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 21 points 2 years ago

Nobody saw this coming… /s

[–] jaschen@lemmynsfw.com 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

The company I work for spends ads on social media companies for ransomware protection and regularly spend is regularly negative. That means we spend more money on advertising than we do in income. We only do it to maintain some market share but otherwise it's just a pure loss on that platform.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kmirl@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thoughts and prayers... ;-)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

Wow, they really spezzed up bad.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›