this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
619 points (95.4% liked)

Technology

71665 readers
2927 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 192 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Look at the sheer scale and number of massive, malicious mistakes that one of our billionaires makes, while having ZERO impact on their tangible quality of life or lifestyle. None. Their ego score goes down and nothing else changes. The people they laid off suffer, never them.

Remember that when some pro-market capitalism class traitor nitwit inevitably tries to shame struggling people for daring to get a latte, eat Avacado toast, or get an education based on learning and growing as a person rather than solely insatiable greed.

People in the little club basically have to rape dozens of people to finally be permitted to fail, like Harvey Weinstein.

You aren't poor because of "your bad decisions," you're poor because of a relatively small, insatiably greedy, powerful group of people that demand and expect almost all of the capital value your effort produces to go directly to them.

[–] Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wasn't the Twitter buyout for a significant portion of his wealth that he like, claimed he didn't even have?

All those people say things like "well they're risking their wealth!" he seems to be a pretty good example of someone who "risked a lot of their wealth", objectively fucked up and should have lost at least most of it, and has come out essentially unscathed.

If you can collosally fuck up a whole company, and your wealth doesn't even move, what are you even risking? At all?

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

Another part of being a billionaire is saying you have it when it's prudent, and saying you don't when it's not.

[–] anlumo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

He sold a few shares to get the money, besides also taking up loans and gifts from others in his billionaire club.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

mush never intended for twitter to become profitable. his only real incentives here are:

a. use saudi money to help kill twitter with some plausible deniability (for legal reasons) b. try my favorite 'business tactics' because i have nothing to lose

he has been very successful at these intended actions

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except it also impacted his other companies because of the public perception of his competence changing drastically.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah, thats where he needs 'plausible deniability'. he can say, 'but i triiiied to make money, those damn libs canceled me'

[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

If it were that easy to cancel a billionaire, this world would be so much better.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago (2 children)

These numbers are relatively easy to explain. Elon Musk is a fucking idiot.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not a finance guy but I agree with this statement.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm waiting for him to get kicked out of Tesla if they still have a board, haha. His acts of removing things like Disney + and such do to political arguments is a direct impact on purchases. I don't think streaming in the front seats should be, but investors should easily know that limiting buyers will devalue the company over time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure a genius like Musk can make that happen! Look how well he's done so far, and in only 1 year.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago

Rookie numbers! I’m sure he can push the value below zero if he just tries hard enough.

[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As others have said this purchase didn't really fuck up his overall lifestyle.

Yet when the topic of raising taxes on these people comes up they all freak out, like if they have to pay an extra 20% on their wealth they will be living on the streets.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He is set for life no matter what.

There is only one way to hurt him- to humiliate him. To hit his ego. Booing him at the Chapelle show, for instance.

All we can do is keep doing that sort of thing until Real Life Iron Man becomes Real Life Terrence Howard as War Machine and gets replaced with some other asshole billionaire that sycophants will worship instead who hopefully will be mildly less insufferable.

[–] retrieval4558@mander.xyz 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can think of other ways to hurt billionaires

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Not ones which don't involve mobs with torches and pitchforks and they have well-paid, well-trained, well-armed security teams to deal with them.

[–] puppy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

The US has an addiction with simping for billionaires. In the rest of the world, only politicians oppose it ('cuz "lobbying"). Not the general public.

[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Buying a multi-billion dollar brand and then rebranding it has got to be in the top 10 all time most smoothbrained business decisions ever, right up there with New Coke and Blockbuster not buying Netflix.

He probably could have started his own social media site to compete with Twitter for 1/1000th of the cost and still have all the Elon poleriders hop on board. It would still be exactly as shitty as X is today, but it could have been done without destroying something somebody else built up. Not that I care, because fuck Twitter too, but if we're looking at this from a purely strategic perspective it's so blindingly obvious this was a bad business move.

[–] RalphFurley@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Every Business School 101 class will use this as a case study

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

he fucked himself into being forced to buy twitter with his big fucking mouth.

only then did he go shopping for who would want to help pay for this mistake... hmmm geee who would want to topple a bastion of liberal communication... in walks the saudis with more money than they know what do with.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zingo@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Social media as it's worse.

Facebook, Instagram, X and WhatsApp, all toxic waste.

At least there are platforms like Lemmy, where people (most of the time) share knowledge in an "anonymous" environment, which is actually brilliant for passing on information to the next man, without the toxication and promotion of suicidal tendencies.

Social media in the common sence always was a cancer in our modern society.

One of the best thing I did till this day was to never have open a Facebook account. I see that as a personal merit!

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't worry, they made one for you. :p

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

The caption of his meme standing with a sink in the building after purchase said "let that sink in" but it should have said "I'm going to sink this company"

[–] silvercove@lemdro.id 17 points 1 year ago

Looking forward to Twitter losing the remaining 28% of value.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Next he should destroy Meta and Amazon. The internet would become a better place.

[–] Monomate@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If the company's private, which means its stocks are not tradeable anymore, what's the point in measuring the company value at this point?

[–] silvercove@lemdro.id 7 points 1 year ago

Banks who loaned Elon money hold a bunch of Twitter stock. They want to eventually cash out.

[–] technicalogical@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can these measurements be used as losses to offset taxes?

[–] runeko@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Typically, losses in one year can be used to offset profits in following years, but not indefinitely... maybe three years tops IIRC. But that would mean the company would have to become very, very profitable profitable, which is doubtful.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They changed the rules under the Tax Cut and Jobs Act and losses can be carried forward indefinitely.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Who knew fascism wouldn't be the rage?

[–] pope@c0tt0n.world 8 points 1 year ago

Twitter the thing you do on the shitter

[–] BlackSkinnedJew@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 1 year ago
[–] theodewere@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

seems like every decision has been carefully designed to do the most damage possible to the brand, while still being mostly legal.. although using twitter to troll legal systems worldwide also seems intentional..

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Seems like many commenting here can't see this.

It's always seemed to me his intent was to diminish the influence of Twitter.

He seemed rather transparent about it.

[–] Stavros@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Maybe it’s time for another rebrand…. ‘Ex’ formerly X formerly Twitter.

load more comments
view more: next ›