this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
584 points (93.5% liked)

Technology

70440 readers
2592 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tesla Cybertruck gets less than 80% of advertised range in YouTuber’s test::A YouTuber took Tesla’s Cybertruck on a ride to see if it can actually hit its advertised 320-mile range, only to find out that its could only reach 79% of the target. When YouTuber Kyle Conn…

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] atmur@lemmy.world 245 points 1 year ago (18 children)

I hate Tesla and especially the Cybertruck as much as the next guy, but this was a highway test and that sounds like a completely normal result.

I own a Bolt EV which is rated for 259 miles of range. On the highway, that's more like ~220. That sounds bad, but the other side of it is that I get ~300 miles of range during my normal work commutes through the city. This is just how EVs are, the estimated range is based on a mixed test. EVs are backwards compared to ICE, you'll get ~20% less range than the EPA estimate driving highway speeds and ~20% more doing purely city driving.

[–] machinin@lemmy.world 136 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wrote this in another comment, but Tesla has been known for a long time to game EPA numbers. Here's an article from 2020 talking about it: https://insideevs.com/news/407807/eletric-car-real-world-range-tested/

Several get below their EPA numbers, but several cars also get higher. Tesla models all get significantly below their claimed mileage.

[–] farcaster@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The insideevs article reports 239 miles for a Model 3 Performance while clicking all the way through to the actual source of the testing "Whatcar" reported 324 miles for a M3 LR. What car indeed. I don't believe these low numbers.

I'm sure Tesla has been overly aggressive with the range numbers. Especially people in colder climates must be getting far less than advertised. But these low-effort articles are not the best of sources.

[–] TheIllustrativeMan@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

It's worth noting that he recently did the same test, with similar temps, in the EV9 (which is also super inefficient on the highway), and got over the EPA range. IIRC most of his range tests exceed EPA numbers.

[–] weew@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

also, the EPA test cycle for highway has a maximum speed of 60mph, with the average below 50

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 101 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I remember when top gear tested a Tesla and found the range they quoted to be wildly over estimates. Tesla lost the lawsuit.

[–] jettrscga@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That article's from 2012, before Elon Musk popularity took off, and yet you can already get a foreshadowing sense of Musk off the article:

Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk called Top Gear "completely phony" and his company sued for libel and malicious falsehoods.

[–] sizzler@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Top Gear were completely phony though, they purposefully ran the battery flat before the demo. This is known. Elons a douche but so is Clarkson.

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also, IIRC, Top Gear have always had a blase attitude towards their influence in the motor world. Given their reputation as petrol heads, and the fact that their review was also critical of the impact of EV's on the environment, they've often fell back on the "we're an entertainment show, you're not supposed to take us as experts", when many manufacturers have often said a negative review could cause significant harm in sales.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Musk lied about something? Ooooh no, he's never done that before. /s

[–] farcaster@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Check the results of other cars in this test here: https://outofspecstudios.com/70-mph-range

Yeah ambient temperature dramatically affects the range of EVs. One time I took my Model 3 on a roadtrip and I had quite a bit of range left when I got to the hotel, but the next morning the temperature had plummeted and suddenly I had to make for the nearest charger instead of continuing on for a while. It's just something we have to get used to with EVs I guess.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It's the same with gas, you just didn't notice it as much. Gas cars definitely get way lower mileage in the winter.

[–] I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

In mine the torque converter clutch won't lock until the transmission is warm. That takes a while in winter.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ton@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Also, the Murdochs are known to fan out the EV bullshit that is being sold these days via their channels.

It's only a matter of time before driving an EV is considered woke.

[–] skulblaka@startrek.website 12 points 1 year ago

It definitely already is and some people will literally buy huge gas sucking trucks that they don't need just to stick it to the libs or whatever

Just throwing away money really but the reasoning is insane

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Already there, a conservative I know said to me "it's only matter of time until they make us all drive EVs"

[–] Tja@programming.dev 13 points 1 year ago

Which is true, many countries have planned bans on the sale of new ICE cars by 2035. Which is good, even now electric cars are starting to be competitive without subsidies.

I would maybe extra-tax ICEs instead of banning them, so you still have your exotic cars with vroom sounds...

[–] rivermonster@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People who do business with tesla deserve what they get.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (17 children)

Shoddy build quality and no physical buttons

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] set_secret@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

ikr they deserve exactly normal damn it

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Did the YouTuber run the same type of test that the EPA would run?

I feel like every car I’ve ever owned has had worse milage than what’s on the sticker. But maybe I have a lead foot.

[–] rdyoung@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You probably do have a lead foot. I can usually best the sticker mpg especially with hybrids.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Is hypermiling different in a hybrid or an EV compared to say an old manual transmission ICE?

EDIT: To be more clear, I guess I was more curious about techniques used. I already am aware how much waste heat and energy there is in ICE vehicles.

[–] farcaster@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One difference is EVs have regenerative breaking. Using your brakes in an ICE is 100% wasted energy, while regen breaking in an EV returns some (I don't know what percentage) of the car's kinetic energy back into the battery.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TheIllustrativeMan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He ran his standard test. Most other EVs in this test exceed the EPA range, most notably he recently tested the EV9 (a literal brick) in similar temperatures.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Good to know. Sounds like this is just the same old shit Elon / Tesla just got slapped for by the feds.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The EPA highway test is 55mph or something around that. These real world tests are all 70mph+

The only way you do better or equal on a 70mph test is

  1. Advertise a smaller range than you actually have

  2. Gear the motor for high speed and have worse performance at lower speeds (EVs typically do better at low vs high, but you could make low even worse)

  3. Have a multi gear motor like Porsche and I think some Audi. Then you don't have to optimize the motor on 1 gear, but it substantially increases cost (but it's a porsche) and complexity and repair costs.

The EPA just needs to make a 70mph test part of the test cycle and make them advertise that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Infynis@midwest.social 13 points 1 year ago

That's honestly way better than I expected. Based on everything else Musk has done recently, and the comedy of errors the Cybertruck has been, I expected 80% less

[–] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Wow, just like the cars!

As someone who bought one of their cars the only real positive is that the charging network is available 24 hours a day and very prominent across most of my travel routes.

Additionally, I would say wait out for this industry to get better since every single manufacturer of EV's is full of absolute horse shit in regards to range and safety, ESPECIALLY anything not coming from USA or Europe. Byd's are fucking death traps

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] skysurfer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What was the EPA rated highway range? The 320 mile range is the EPA combined city/highway which you won't hit doing entirely highway but you would beat doing entirely city.

Most EVs he's tested hit or exceed the EPA range on this test. Even bricks like the EV9 exceed their EPA range in similar temps.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Why is the efficiency lower on highways?

[–] skysurfer@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Due to electric drivetrains having minimal fixed losses at low speed unlike internal combustion engines. Aerodynamic losses start becoming the largest factor for EVs at relatively low speeds (25-35 MPH) since other losses at so low. This shows up on tests as higher city efficiency and lower highway.

For an internal combustion engine you are burning a large amount of energy just to keep the engine running, so the slower the speed, the less distance traveled for the fixed amount of running losses and lower the MPG. It isn't until higher speeds (55-65 MPH) that aerodynamic losses become the largest factor. This manifests as lower efficiency in the city tests and higher highway.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

It's also a factor that acceleration/deceleration in an ICE kills mileage. Highway tests maintain a constant speed. If you ran the same test at 35 mph, they would get much better mileage than at 55 (or 70)

[–] flyingjake@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Idle losses are real but not very substantial in a modern engine compared to the bigger factor you're missing which is that in city driving tests there is a lot of speeding up and slowing down, ICE vehicles throw away all the energy used to slow down as heat in the brakes which makes city cycles particularly inefficient while an EV captures that energy through regenerative braking, dramatically reducing the net cost of those momentum changes.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Thann@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Also regenerative breaking is not useful when you're maintaining constant speed on the highway, but a huge leg-up in the city

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Labotomized@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Is this any different than EPA rated MPG listed on vehicles? Obviously their quoted range is an absolute best case scenario. Still fun to meme on the cyber truck though.

[–] machinin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Tesla has been known for a long time to game EPA numbers. Here's an article from 2020 talking about it: https://insideevs.com/news/407807/eletric-car-real-world-range-tested/

[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's not a best case scenario - it's a precisely repeated series of accelerations, cruising with a specific amount of resistance applied to the wheels, and braking.

It won't match any real world drive. In the real world there are other variables, traffic, wind, hills, speed limits, etc. It's also intended to be a fairly typical highway drive, so in ideal conditions you will do better than the EPA range. Down hill, for example, the cybertruck can drive forever (unlike an ICE, which is so inefficient it uses energy even going down hill).

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Modern ICE cars do not use fuel when coasting down hill. The computer completely shuts off the fuel injectors when coasting and the physical energy from the car rolling keeps the engine turning over.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I've found EPA MPG estimates to be fairly accurate. Unless I'm driving aggressively or there's a lot of elevation change the highway average has been spot on the EPA number in every car I've driven enough to pay attention to the MPG.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›