this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
128 points (92.1% liked)

politics

26901 readers
2033 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NotBillMurray@lemmy.world 111 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

Glad I'm not the only one, apparently all of new Hampshire as well.

[–] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 years ago
[–] myrandomnname@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Uh, not Bill Murray....

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

"Government Repair Truck Coffee Conversations"

WTF does that even mean? Maybe that's part of the problem?

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

I feel like there's a hyphen missing.

[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Conversations over coffee with the driver of the government repair truck.

It’s so convoluted of a way to say I am going to fix the government and would like to hear from you on how

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Here's his platform if anybody wants to read it. I took a brief look and he doesn't look materially different from Biden. And Biden at least knows to cancel an event when it's 20 degrees and the roads are still being plowed. I hope.

I think the big problem in America is that we don't know what better even looks like anymore. Yeah, I could work and fight and donate and call and text for Dean Philips and I'll get more of the same. Or we might get worse, because Trump can at least draw flies.

The system is broken, and we all feel it.

[–] tpihkal@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (8 children)

It was literally like the first really cold day after the first decent snow storm this winter in New England, and it's a weekday. I wouldn't have gone even if I knew who the hell he is.

The primary candidate has already been chosen for the Democrats. Biden is probably the only candidate that stands a chance against Trump which is pretty fucking sad.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

He's the only one who stands a chance because he's effectively demanding the nomination (not an unusual stance from the party's incumbent). Any prominent Democrat could beat Trump, and probably more reliably than Biden given the polling and his unfavorables, but no one of stature will challenge Biden and risk splitting the party. Biden is not our best chance, but he's the only chance we're going to get.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Even more people know who Cenk Uygur is.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Cheese@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] tpihkal@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] tpihkal@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I strongly believe that the US Native rule is imperative to US Sovereignty so I would never agree to revoking it. You want to lead the country, you have to have a life long investment it.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I am honestly neutral on this subject. I don't think it would affect my vote, but the constitution says that you have to be native born, so that's kind of it.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago

Same. It'll maybe exclude some people with just as much investment in America as a native born citizen, but we're a country of 300M+, we shouldn't have trouble finding scores of equally talented candidates. And yet we're getting a rematch of two extremely old men who are both disliked by most Americans. Our problem isn't the presidential qualification requirements.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 8 points 2 years ago

outside

amazing planning

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago
[–] Blackout@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

They probably all went to Old Hampshire by mistake

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I wonder if he is making money, or at least getting fundraising dollars

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

marianne williamson is more interesting than this guy

[–] pregnantwithrage@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Dean Phillips is literally just a younger Joe Biden, he is running on "I'm not old". Williamson is running on Bernie's platform and is actually running on a platform of reform, regardless if you like her or not she is actually something different imo.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Reporters showed up. That's the funniest part. They were ready to cover this nobody.

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They were desperate to cover this nobody for their headline to read, "Dems in disarray"

[–] tpihkal@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They were local nobody's showing up to do an underpaid job. I have personal connections with people that work this type of media coverage and I'm only glad that they enjoy their career over the things that they used to do that sometimes paid more.

[–] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

They were local nobody’s showing up to do an underpaid job.

Right? It's not like CNN's sending out Anderson Cooper to cover this bozo's little "campaign" event. It's embarrassing how clueless people on social media are about how the media operates. It'd be hilarious except these same people come to every single damn comment section trying to criticize journalistic practices as if they're experts rather than discussing the actual article.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, covering a candidate's event is a huge conspiracy by the evil media.

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It is indeed much easier to object to statements no one made than to address someone's comment.

And it isn't a conspiracy it is simply corpos doing what is best for their interests regardless of the damage caused. (see, that is called addressing what was stated rather than making things up and pretending.)

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You said that they were only covering this because they were desperate to make up a bogus headline.

Please reread my comment and explain what yours has to do with it.

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social -2 points 2 years ago

No, I did not. You assumed I intended that. The headline is written by entirely different people than the story, most often, and it shall reflect marketing's instructions for click bait as passed down from the board that are only interested in making a "sporting event" style share because no one read the story. In fact the marketing dept. shall often trial multiple different click bait headlines and as per instructions from on high all shall be some variant on "how this is bad for Biden" or "Dems in disarray" or similar. And the editor shall edit the story to reduce length and attempt to support the predetermined PR headline's premise. No conspiracy, just business standard in modern "journalism".

[–] Redshlrt@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Everyone is shitting on him but I'd like a Democrat alternative to Biden. I don't think Biden does a good job selling his accomplishments over the last few years, and while normally I like that mentality, he has to run against somebody that lies loudly to list his accomplishments.

As long as the primary isn't tearing the other guy down, what's the issue here?

load more comments
view more: next ›