this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
28 points (71.2% liked)

Apple

19033 readers
2 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

No matter if you feel the price tag is too high, or feel it’s a gimmick that won’t appeal to many, the Vision Pro will usher in a new era of apps and products.

To me, this is similar to when the iPhone was getting ready to be released. Many said it was expensive, had no keyboard, was too big and wide to be comfortably held, and would never sell. That all started to change once people got their hands on the device.

I feel that the Vision Pro will have the same effect, but this is one device you’ll truly need to test out and experience. Based on those that have been fortunate enough to actually use it, it’s not a gimmick.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yuriy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone talks about avoiding oculus products because of the walled garden of available apps, but these are gonna change the world? It’s just a bigger garden with a bigger wall, I just don’t see it happening.

[–] hightrix@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

The feeling I get from people that avoid Facebook products is not due to the walled garden but instead due to the company that makes the product.

I don’t want to strap a data collection device to sell me more ads to my face. Hence, I won’t buy an HMD from an advertising company.

Apple is not an advertising company. Yes they advertise on their own properties but a majority of their revenue does not come from ads. As such, Apples incentives are drastically different than Facebook, so I will buy hardware from them.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The iPhone was expensive when it came out, but it was still within the realm of affordability. It was only $100 more than I paid for my Razr. This, on the other hand, is outrageously expensive. I can’t see people buying one until the price comes down significantly.

[–] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

These will be successful, but nowhere close to the levels of the iPhone. They are too expensive and lacks the everyday use cases for most people. Besides, Apple cannot even make them in super high numbers.

[–] Romkslrqusz@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gotta wonder how much of the author’s amazement stems from the fact that they weren’t really into VR before. Most of the experiences they described have been around since 2016.

[–] realitista@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yes I wondered the exact same thing. It sounded a lot like everyone's first reaction to VR.

[–] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I had a phone in my pocket before the iPhone came out. It was quite similar. It replaced an existing item that had room for improvement.

These goggles are not replacing or upgrading anything.

Not saying it’s a bad product but I disagree with your take on it being similar to the iPhone. It’s too niche and too expensive.

[–] kerrypacker@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not at that price they don’t.

[–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you’re forgetting how much the iPhone cost compared to the other phones of the time (and some that were even free with service). Now, no one thinks twice about spending $600 on a smartphone.

[–] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m not forgetting anything, don’t assume things on my behalf.

[–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your previous statement would suggest otherwise. It was something that was said verbatim about the iPhone.

[–] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The iPhone cost 499$ in 2007. The Motorola RAZR cost 600$ in 2004.

The device wasn’t expensive, the plans were.

[–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The iPhone was $499 with a subsidy from AT&T. The RAZR had no such subsidy and could be bought without a contract or even from eBay. Even the most expensive “smartphones” on the market didn’t need a subsidized price. The device absolutely was expensive. You’re trying to revise history.

[–] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are wrong. Look it up, I already have.

I’m not going to waste any more time arguing with you.

[–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I literally lived through it…lol. And I bought it. It was exclusive to Cingular and then AT&T (they bought Cingular). I don’t need to look it up.

[–] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it was exclusive to them why did us peeps up in Canada have them too then? We don’t have Cingular or AT&T.

Take your foot out of your mouth. This is a learning experience. Do your homework before you run your mouth.

I paid 499$ (USD) for mine.

[–] brnaftreadn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry Playa. He’s right. The first iPhones were ATT only.

[–] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the USA maybe.

I’m not arguing with you about something I had in my hand when you said I didn’t, that’s just ridiculous.

Walk on.

[–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Well you sure as shit didn’t have it in Canada, considering it was never released in Canada. The first iPhone in Canada was the 3G and it was also subsidized but by Rogers in 2008, a year after the original launch. You had to have a contract and the data plan was mandatory. The iPhone price plans were also higher than standard plans to mitigate the cost of the extra subsidy on the 3G.