this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023

-1 points (46.7% liked)

Lefty Memes

5709 readers

25 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes

That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)

0.5 [Provisional Rule] Use alt text or image descriptions to allow greater accessibility

(Please take a look at our wiki page for the guidelines on how to actually write alternative text!)

We require alternative text (from now referred to as "alt text") to be added to all posts/comments containing media, such as images, animated GIFs, videos, audio files, and custom emojis.
EDIT: For files you share in the comments, a simple summary should be enough if they’re too complex.

We are committed to social equity and to reducing barriers of entry, including (digital) communication and culture. It takes each of us only a few moments to make a whole world of content (more) accessible to a bunch of folks.

When alt text is absent, a reminder will be issued. If you don't add the missing alt text within 48 hours, the post will be removed. No hard feelings.

1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here

Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.

2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such

That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.

3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.

That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).

4. No Bigotry.

The only dangerous minority is the rich.

5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)

6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.

Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

Racism
Sexism
Queerphobia
Ableism
Classism
Rape or assault
Genocide/ethnic cleansing or (mass) deportations
Fascism
(National) chauvinism
Orientalism
Colonialism or Imperialism (and their neo- counterparts)
Zionism
Religious fundamentalism of any kind

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com

squid_slime@lemm.ee

-1

White veganism (media.kbin.social)

submitted 2 years ago by MemeCollector@kbin.social to c/leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I won't be debating this, don't bother.

top 35 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] mealworms@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

"DON'T EAT MEAT!!" the EVIL vegan SCREAMS at the STARVING AFRICAN CHILD in the scenario I MADE UP in my HEAD to get MAD AT

[–] monsoon@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Vegans are far more likely to have changed their consumption habits outside of veganism as well. It is not a "save the animals and fuck everyone else" stance, and it is odd that you try to make it seem like that.

We're all just trying to do our best. With animal products it's simple; if there's a dead animal on your plate then you can be sure an animal suffered for your meal.

[–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Man y’all really get so upset about the fact that we exist (showing that you too could live and thrive without murder) that you make up the wildest bullshit

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Mmm. I've seen the original tumblr post. It's not mocking veganism. It's pointing out problematic behaviour under the guise of moral purity.

Might wanna have a readup on 'decolonising veganism'

[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

hard agree, tho I would say that all exploitation that stems from humans should be opposed. Indiginous (or just generally conscious) hunting, however, is necessary in todays world to keep at least some semblance of ecological balance and I would not compare it to exploitation on an industrial scale

and ofc Veganism without class consciousness is like environmental activism without class consciousness: just privileged gardening

[–] MemeCollector@kbin.social -4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Don't forget so so much ableism too!

And just for shits and gigs, not that its anyone's business - I'm actually vegan myself lmfao I'm just able to realise that that doesn't give me any moral superiority over anyone and that what others eat isnt my business, destroying capitalism is.

[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I think veganism should be encouraged from a administrative level, but it's similar to the process of secularization. For example: You can't force people away from religion and it's abusive practices (or eating meat for that matter). Education campaigs and massive restructurings in all social fields to make it more accessible, be it in terms of the school system (,costs of food or adjustments in the health sector) are needed to further secularization (or veganization) imo

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Practically, you can't literally force people to stop eating meat, but we should do everything we can.

[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I agree but there have to be alternative structures in place first. Structures on which people rely on during and after the adjument. You need that procedure if you don't want to hit less priviliged people disproportionally hard (as it the case with closing coal power plants for example)

[+] NotAPenguin@kbin.social -12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Which structures are missing?

We already have plant based alternatives for everything and plenty of resources to help people transition.

[–] mouseless@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

readily available education ("just google it" is insufficient in the current SEO fuelled hellscape) and support to help people build their own plant based diets, combined with plant based alternatives that are just as cheap + easy + nutritionally balanced. IMO there's great progress towards both, but neither are there yet for becoming vegetarian/vegan to be a trivial process for those who want to.

I'm physically disabled and struggle with most meal prep, so I mostly live on frozen meals. On an especially good day, i can make a sandwich, or put some chips in the oven. Can't manage much more than that, and I've failed to find plant based alternatives to those things that i can both afford, and make myself. It could exist, but I haven't been able to find it, and the sheer volume of ableism in the vegan (etc) community is exhausting to sift through. The last time I tried had some guy talking down to me telling me that "foraging isn't that hard, actually", lmao. And i'm someone who wants to reduce how much meat I eat, and have been trying to do so despite all of this!

To be fair, there are a couple of veggie frozen meals at my local store (nothing vegan, though). But have you tried rotating the same 3 meals for a year and not completely losing it?

[–] MemeCollector@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There will ALWAYS be people who eat animals, for medical or cultural resons and they should not be excluded.
The cruelty is in the industry not in a practice that is as natural as nature itself.

[+] NotAPenguin@kbin.social -11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There's very few medical reasons to consume animal products and the few there are will hopefully have alternatives soon.
Bringing that up in the context of the general population going vegan is silly.

Cultural norms is not a good reason to engage in exploitation.

The cruelty is absolutely in the practice, killing others is wrong.
Non human animals are living and feeling beings just like you and I, they experience the world, they have likes and dislikes, they have best friends, they enjoy chilling in the sun.
Just like humans, other animals also have the right to not be needlessly killed.

[–] Alaknar@kbin.social -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just like humans, other animals also have the right to not be needlessly killed.

So when do you start a campaign to turn cats and dogs vegan? What's the plan for lions and bears living in the wild?

[+] NotAPenguin@kbin.social -9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Cats and dogs can thrive on a plant based diet, so yes that's what we should feed them.

Wild animals don't have the capability to consider the consequences of their actions or the possibility to not eat other animals, humans do.

Do you normally base your morals on what wild animals do?

[–] Alaknar@kbin.social -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Cats and dogs can thrive on a plant based diet

That's flat out wrong. Cats are obligate carnivores, so feed them vegan diet only if you really want them to suffer horribly.

Wild animals don't have the capability to consider the consequences of their actions

If you consider the "capability to consider the consequences of one's actions" as the ultimate method of determining if killing is OK or not... then you should be equally fine with mentally disturbed humans killing other humans. Are you?

Do you normally base your morals on what wild animals do?

Let's not involve "morality" into this, since morality is a very subjective thing. The morality of abortions being an excellent example. It also puts the whole discussion about, say, euthanasia in a very peculiar spot.

Also: what about the morality of extreme deforestation to make room for farms growing vegan food? What about the morality of the increase in carbon emissions, the destruction of topsoil and reduction of biodiversity that soy farming brings?

The problem with meat industry is that, well, it became an industry. Excess is the evil here, not the ACT of consuming an animal. There are plenty of ways of giving animals excellent, pleasant lives and then ending these lives in a way that produces no fear, no trauma in them. Or even awareness of the fact.

We are all just life. Life starts, requires fuel, and then ends. Sometimes life kills other life in order to get the fuel, and that's fine. What we, as the most technologically advanced form of life on this planet can do, is do all in our power to ensure that while all the forms of fuel remain available to us, we do so without causing excess harm. Which also means things like growing meat in labs instead of obtaining it through the killing of animals, of course. I'm very much a fan of the concept of lab-grown meat, but that's just something that's not obtainable on a large enough scale in the nearest future.

[+] NotAPenguin@kbin.social -10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Cats are obligate carnivores in nature because of taurine, cat food doesn't have taurine because the ingredients are shit so synthetic taurine is added to meet the cat's nutritional needs.
The same synthetic taurine is also added to plant based cat food so it meets the cat's nutriotional needs.
Dogs are omnivores like us and can easily thrive on a plant based diet.

Yes let's involve morality, needless killing of animals is immoral.

Most farm land is used for animal feed.
only 20% of soy is used for direct human consumption, the rest is animal feed, so if you want less soy farming you should drop the animal products.

Excess is the evil here, not the ACT of consuming an animal. There are plenty of ways of giving animals excellent, pleasant lives and then ending these lives in a way that produces no fear, no trauma in them. Or even awareness of the fact.

No it's the act that's wrong, needlessly killing other beings when we don't have to is clearly evil.
There is no way to ethically kill someone who doesn't need or want to die.
You wouldn't accept these condition for "human farms".

We are all just life. Life starts, requires fuel, and then ends. Sometimes life kills other life in order to get the fuel, and that's fine.

Why be cruel when we can easily avoid it?

[–] Alaknar@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Cats are obligate carnivores in nature because of taurine

From the wiki:

Specifically, cats have high protein requirements and their metabolisms appear unable to synthesize essential nutrients such as retinol, arginine, taurine, and arachidonic acid;

There's another problem of the cat digestive system just being too short to handle most plant matter.

so if you want less soy farming you should drop the animal products

I want to. Well, not "drop" but rather "limit". That's exactly why I mentioned "excess" being the problem here.

You didn't answer the question, though - how do you feel about the morality of topsoil degradation, greenhouse emissions and biodiversity reduction caused by most vegan food alternatives?

No it's the act that's wrong, needlessly killing other beings when we don't have to is clearly evil.

Please reply to this question:

If you consider the "capability to consider the consequences of one's actions" as the ultimate method of determining if killing is OK or not... then you should be equally fine with mentally disturbed humans killing other humans. Are you?

You wouldn't accept these condition for "human farms".

Which conditions? The majority of farms - sure, the conditions are horrible and it's exactly what I'm saying we should eliminate. But there are modern farms that have conditions most of the human population would gladly sign up for. Damn, I'd be one of them!

Why be cruel when we can easily avoid it?

Precisely my point. That being said, there are a myriad of methods of killing an animal without being cruel.

[+] NotAPenguin@kbin.social -11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There's protein in plant based cat food.

You didn't answer the question, though - how do you feel about the morality of topsoil degradation, greenhouse emissions and biodiversity reduction caused by most vegan food alternatives?

I did; Most farm land is used for animal feed., so plant based food uses way less farm land and thus causes way less degradation and emissions.

If you consider the "capability to consider the consequences of one's actions" as the ultimate method of determining if killing is OK or not... then you should be equally fine with mentally disturbed humans killing other humans. Are you?

Mentally disturbed humans who act violently are still humans and part of our pack, I think we should make sure they don't hurt others.

Which conditions? The majority of farms - sure, the conditions are horrible and it's exactly what I'm saying we should eliminate.

The conditions of "humane" treatment but still killing.

But there are modern farms that have conditions most of the human population would gladly sign up for.

You seriously think that humans would sign up to get needlessly killed for profit/taste..?

Precisely my point. That being said, there are a myriad of methods of killing an animal without being cruel.

How do you ethically kill someone who doesn't need or want to die?

[–] Alaknar@kbin.social -2 points 2 years ago

I did; Most farm land is used for animal feed., so plant based food uses way less farm land and thus causes way less degradation and emissions.

Most is not all... Also: if we practically eliminate the meat industry, the "vegan farms" need to grow as well. It's not like all that land that's currently being degraded for animal feed will be freed to recover. No, it will still be producing environmentally catastrophic food - but for humans directly.

Mentally disturbed humans who act violently are still humans and part of our pack, I think we should make sure they don't hurt others

That's not an answer to my question, though. You posited that only the "capability of understanding that you're causing harm" determines whether killing is OK or not.

Wild animals do not have that capacity, therefore them killing other animals is OK.

Which means that humans with damaged cognitive abilities (like psychopaths, sadists, etc) killing other humans without the realisation of the hurt they're causing... Is also OK.

You seriously think that humans would sign up to get needlessly killed for profit/taste..?

Yes.

How do you ethically kill someone who doesn't need or want to die?

So here we come back to my previous question: how to you prevent wild animals from killing other wild animals who most definitely don't want (or, in many cases, need) to die?

And also my other previous question: how do you ethically deforest swathes of land, destroying topsoil and biodiversity, ALSO killing lots of animals in the process - directly or, mostly, indirectly, through the removal of their natural hunting/feeding grounds and condemning them to starvation?

EDIT: changed the link to an even more appropriate one. The previous link, for those interested, HERE.

[+] NotAPenguin@kbin.social -13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hunting is not necessary, humans killed all the natural predators because we didn't want them attacking livestock.
If we stopped animal agriculture then natural predators could be allowed back.
And we can use non-violent population control methods.

Also, deer are straight up bred and released just so people can hunt them.

Hunting is needless killing and cruel because we can easily thrive without.

[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

What do we do in the mean time? You know that eco-system recovery is a veeery long process. Also idk if that is another case of US-exceptionalism but that would be the first time I heard of the practice of breeding deer just to release them for hunting (not smth I know from continental europe)

The model of requiring a license for hunting with a ~ a year of prior training (or some other proof of the necessary knowledge for those who grew up with it for example) and restricting it to certain times and species as long as we haven't introduced natural predators again (which is not always viable, mind you) is a good model imo

[–] MemeCollector@kbin.social -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

People making this about their white veganism ignoring the indigenous voice proving the point be like
https://files.catbox.moe/j7b85y.jpg

[–] MemeCollector@kbin.social -4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If you feel personally attacked by this thats something for you to consider with yourself.
Nowhere do I say don't go vegan or advocate the meat industry, but you bulldozing over marginalized voices with your fingers in your ears singing the capitalism song as the earth hurtles towards destruction while you try and blame individuals for systematic problems is bordering on satire and got old about a decade ago.
Feel free to continue performing to the void if you please.

[–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

I thought you weren’t going to debate?

Did your Jimmies get rustled?

[–] MemeCollector@kbin.social -5 points 2 years ago

Image of thread by
#DearNonNatives @dearnonnatives:
"Don't wear fur" yells the vegan "instead wear fake fur made from plastics that'll take hundreds of years to decompose into microplastics that harm the living things that ingest it, impacting entire ecosystems, or else you don't really care about animals" they say.

"If you eat meat you're speciest" the vegan yells at an Indigenous hunter. "You should be supporting the exploitation and labor of people of color around the world so unique foods can be shipped to you from around the world at low prices instead" they say.

Vegans will literally get mad at an Indigenous person for shooting a deer or killing a seal to feed their family and suggest that if they don't want THEIR family to stave maybe someone else's family in South America can so things like quinoa can be ~~easily accessible~~