The title is misleading and the article even points it out. She is displaying Doom (which is still cool and kinda fucking crazy) on bacteria. It is not being processed by the bacteria.
this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
51 points (85.9% liked)
Gaming
19960 readers
1 users here now
Sub for any gaming related content!
Rules:
- 1: No spam or advertising. This basically means no linking to your own content on blogs, YouTube, Twitch, etc.
- 2: No bigotry or gatekeeping. This should be obvious, but neither of those things will be tolerated. This goes for linked content too; if the site has some heavy "anti-woke" energy, you probably shouldn't be posting it here.
- 3: No untagged game spoilers. If the game was recently released or not released at all yet, use the Spoiler tag (the little ⚠️ button) in the body text, and avoid typing spoilers in the title. It should also be avoided to openly talk about major story spoilers, even in old games.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
The day we can use biocomputers like that is when criminals start hiding URLs in their DNA to rickroll the police chasing them
Fuck rickrolls, I'd hide the EICAR test string and watch their lab computers lock up whenever they try to process my sample.
"To be blunt, the frame rate is atrocious, likely due to the fact that bacteria were never intended to display 3D video games. It takes 70 minutes for the bacteria to illuminate one frame of the game and another eight hours to return to its starting state. This translates to nearly nine hours per frame, which means it would take around 600 years to ~~play~~ display the game from start to finish."
Made me giggle, anyway.
Bad apple in bacteria when?
Bacterial computers when 👀
Doom players play on bacteria, Ultrakill players play on phages: https://phagesdb.org/phages/MinosPhrime/