this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
131 points (85.0% liked)

Technology

70847 readers
3021 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Northwestern University researchers have introduced a soil-microbe-powered fuel cell, significantly outperforming similar technologies and providing a sustainable solution for powering low-energy devices.

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 53 points 1 year ago (4 children)

How much power does it produce? It must be pretty bad since they don't mention it anywhere in the article.

[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

The linked article has a table that gives 1.74 uW/cm^2. However glancing over the rest of the paper there's a ton of variability of output.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Damn I hoped it would go to eleven, I need that little bit extra.

[–] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For low power applications. You won't be charging your phone off this.

[–] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Depends on how many fuel cells you get and are able to shovel dirt into

[–] Hobbes@startrek.website -2 points 1 year ago

1.21 gigawatts

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Love these pie in the sky articles that get debunked immediately in the comments

[–] Magrath@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who debunked this? I don't any comments debunking it.

Also if you read the article it has limited applications so it's not some pie in the sky you think it.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I kind of get op's point. It's not straight up debunked, but it's so few microwatts that they can power the sensor but they can't store log data.

It requires a close proximity powered base station nearby to fire a signal out to get reflected back somehow.

I'm having a hard time picturing any viable setup outside of a laboratory experiment. If you've got a powered base station within a few inches of it why not just power it with that?

[–] TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

" As long as there is organic carbon in the soil for the microbes to break down, the fuel cell can potentially last forever.”

It's also a stationary battery

"Although the entire device is buried, the vertical design ensures that the top end is flush with the ground’s surface."

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 year ago
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago
[–] THEDAEMON@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

Can it power DOOM !

[–] pandacoder@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So if the tip is sticking out for airflow, how does it handle a flash flood?

[–] JPAKx4@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"Furthermore, the researchers used waterproofing material on the cathode's surface, allowing it to work during flooding and assuring progressive drying after submersion."

https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/new-fuel-cell-taps-energy-from-dirt-dwelling-microbes-to-power-sensors

[–] pandacoder@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I missed that part in the article, I should have just searched for the word flood, woops

[–] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Sensuously?