this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
111 points (89.4% liked)

Games

39591 readers
1467 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Call_Me_Maple@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (1 children)

To call this an anime is just plain wrong. This is a series of animated shorts, completely unvoiced to boot. I'd have saved some time flipping through storyboard pictures. But still, it's always nice to see games branch out in these ways. Just wish people would call things what they are cause I had completely different expectations going in.

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Overwatch at least has it's short animated series voiced

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Give them a break. All five voice actors were busy.

[–] Call_Me_Maple@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Right? I mean, I don't discredit Bethesda too much on the production quality, they're cute animated shorts it's just I wish the media wouldn't try to spin it a certain way to get clicks.

[–] toxicbubble@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Call_Me_Maple@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Thanks for this.

[–] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well alright, I’ll bite.

[–] 2tone@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (3 children)

There's a lot of build up for Starfield. A lot of pressure and a lot of expectations. Hoping it's decent

[–] Its_Always_420@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well even if it isn't, we'll shove it full of mods anyway.

[–] substill@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

The most fun Bethesda game will always be xEdit.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

They (Bethesda) have a track record of making great games, even counting all the buggy, glitchy, janky bullshit that comes with them. I'm not expecting a total failure or a smooth launch based on literally every game they've put out since I discovered them with Morrowind. A good game, with the same jank and maybe even new jank is what I'm expecting.

[–] colonial@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The jank is part of the charm. Who doesn't remember Skyrim Horsing their way up a mountain?

[–] SpicyLiquidJar@waveform.social 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah, I think they get some unfair flack for "buggy" games. It's kinda true, but at the same time I feel like they release boundary-pushing games. Granted Im also looking back at skyrim and FO3 with the bias of nostalgia.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I largely believe that to be the only reason horses exist in Skyrim because unlike Oblivion, you don't actually go any faster on a horse in Skyrim.

[–] Chailles@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

To be fair, by the end of Oblivion, you end up faster than a horse in Oblivion (and while you could make your own horse faster, it did also increase the chance of the horse dying because you ran too fast off a hill).

[–] Crystal_Shards64@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I feel like the game is largely an unknown at this point. We saw some gameplay but I feel like I would want to wait for reviews. Bethesda has a strong track record though so I'm hoping it should be good.

[–] picassowary@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

“Bethesda has a strong track record though” i mean… do they?

their games sell a lot of units but i can’t remember any time since morrowind that they launched a game that received widespread praise for anything other than its technical merits, and i say this as someone who still dips back into heavily modded TES games a few times a year :/

[–] radix@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Morrowind: 89 on Metacritic
Oblivion: 94
Fallout 3: 91
Skyrim: 94
Fallout 4: 84

PC scores, for consistency. There are plenty of better games out there, but most AAA studios would kill for that kind of consistently good-but-not-quite-legendary track record.

[–] beefsack@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Morrowind scoring lower than Oblivion and Skyrim is a travesty.

[–] LetMeEatCake@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

After a certain point, scores are as much based on hype as quality.

That's not even a malicious choice, either. Hype influences our experiences and perceptions of whatever is being hyped. It's intuitively obvious that people will enjoy a good thing that they are hyped about more than a good thing that they are not hyped about. Hype is strongest just before release... which is exactly when reviewers play and assign a score to a game.

A sequel to a well received game is going to have more hype than the predecessor in most circumstances. Morrowind sold something like 5-10x the copies as Daggerfall and came about at a time when there was a lot of upheaval in the industry from a target-audience standpoint: a lot of potential Morrowind players (and reviewers) would have not played Daggerfall.

In essence, Oblivion was reviewed more positively because of the positive reception of Morrowind. The positive reception of Oblivion in turn boosted Skyrim.

This is not to say people would hate the games without the prior game before it or hype, just that there is a "hype boost" for games.

[–] picassowary@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

oh yeah the metacritic scores are good but i was referring to audience reception about characters, narrative, etc

fallout 3 in particular is a fun one because once people started beating it there was a general upswell of “what the fuck was that?” that was loud enough that we got a changed ending in DLC :)

[–] Alto@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's been a while since they've actually released one of their mainline games. I don't really count TES:O and FO:76 as IIRC neither had the normal dev teams working on them.

Im cautiously optimistic about it all, but am obviously going to wait for reviews.

[–] picassowary@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

the thing for me about starfield is that most of the game looks like a reskin of games i’ve already played (no man’s sky, elite dangerous) and the parts that don’t look like mainline bethesda fare but In Space, so my general vibe about starfield is pretty dismal

would be absolutely stoked for it to turn out well though. more games in space = good

[–] Transcendant@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

looks like a reskin of games i’ve already played (no man’s sky, elite dangerous) and the parts that don’t look like mainline bethesda fare but In Space

Don't threaten me with a good time!

[–] Chailles@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What exactly do you think merits a strong track record then? If a series of games consistently over the course of 20 years being highly regarded, still being played, still growing with active communities, and selling extremely well for nearly every single title you made isn't a "strong track record," then who can claim that right?

It's not even like other game franchises which "just sell a lot of units" like sports games which tend to not do anything with their formula and release the same game but worse yearly.

[–] picassowary@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

well the context was about the quality of the game and not how many units they sell, so :/

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They have a strong track record of releasing broken games with potential, potential that mod makers actually pull out of the game while Bethesda reaps massive profits

[–] Crystal_Shards64@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Their games are buggy, but people are still talking about them and enjoying them. Modders have done a lot of (if not most of) the heavy lifting of course. But I don't think we would be seeing so many mods if the core games were bad.

load more comments
view more: next ›