this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
136 points (95.9% liked)

InsanePeopleFacebook

3552 readers
1 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 78 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It's always just a bunch of word salad.

I sent them a memorandum to fineagle and reassess, along with my stamped proof of residual sentience, but they haven't gotten back to me about my right to reconnoiter.

[–] Naja_Kaouthia@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey can I get you to co-sign my writ of certification certifying that I’m a former and current eukaryote?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You mean a private, unincorporated natural graduated zygote? Oh absolutely. Just let me get the notary of Registror the Imperative and a gallon of matriculated justifier.

[–] Naja_Kaouthia@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Don’t forget to CC the Grand Admiral of the Ocean so he can certify my validity and bona fides for use in the Admirality Court.

[–] state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's how magic spells sound to non-magic users. Like all magic their shit is also made up.

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 59 points 1 year ago (1 children)

... by the doctrine of avoidable consequences

that's official government talk for "you're a dumbass on purpose"

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Also known as "I'm suffering from the consequences of my actions"

[–] Okokimup@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is it a requirement that these native English speakers barely speak english?

If they understood what words meant, they wouldn't be SovCits.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

They definitely aren't too bright.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] notabot@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Thanks for the extra details, I love their certainty the their process means there's 'no argument'. This guy's going to get a fascinating leason in court.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They always assure each other they're right, and they're always wrong.

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

It rather brings to mind the quote from Pauli: "That is not only not right; it is not even wrong", in that it's such utter nonsense that it makes no sense in the context.

[–] AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Will he, though?

[–] SeabassDan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

yes, I did everything notarized

what matters is the judge's ruling

Notary's milking these guys dry, and the judge only matters until they rule against this poor dude.

[–] Prestron@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Requesting dismissal with prejudice is just a great detail. If granted, and the plaintiff tries to bring another suit for the same events, they’ll basically be told to GTFO.

[–] Granite@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Soooo he didn’t even go after the correct towing company.

[–] yuriy@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He probably named them individually in the suit in addition to the company. One could argue he’s alleging that the named parties all personally engaged in towing his vehicle.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Classic SovCit "logic", can't be held responsible for their actions because that was the company set up in their name not their living person, but then tries to hold a company and other individual persons responsible for shit they don't like

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

That reminds me I need to run to the store to pick up some more silents.