this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
353 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

70395 readers
3701 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Canada to ban the Flipper Zero to stop surge in car thefts::The Canadian government plans to ban the Flipper Zero and similar devices after tagging them as tools thieves can use to steal cars.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 134 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Oh shit, I wanted to steal a car but now because of this ban it will be illegal, how bad.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 103 points 1 year ago (10 children)

They should really try banning car theft, it's a lot more direct and to the point.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

But at least they can persecute tinkerers and cyber security professionals while the criminals continue to steal cars.

It's win-win for the POS in law enforcement. They create more crime stats for themselves to ensure their increased funding, and the criminals continue stealing cars.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Even better, tinkerers and cyber security professionals are easy to find and there's a much lower chance of them fighting back compared to actual car thieves so it's very low risk for the police. They get to be lazy and safe while padding their numbers, all their favorite things at once.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 93 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Classic response, don't hold the billion dollar corpos who actually design and manufacture the cars responsible. Ban the little device that exposes the flaws in their designs.

[–] 7heo@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah, let's entirely outlaw pentesting while we're at it. What could possibly go wrong? 🙈

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lets outlaw devices that could be used for pentesting while we're at it. PCs, laptops, phones, etc.

[–] twack@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Don't forget paperclips, string, and aerosol cans. Hell, we should probably just ban wire altogether.

[–] 7heo@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Brains. Technically that is the most useful device when pentesting. Along with curiosity. Altho on the former, I believe we, as a society, have actually started to...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fapper_McFapper@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago (4 children)

lol, you can do many things with a flipper zero. Stealing a car is not one of those things.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 50 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"Flipper Zero can't be used to hijack any car, specifically the ones produced after the 1990s, since their security systems have rolling codes," Flipper Devices COO Alex Kulagin told BleepingComputer.

I guess Canada must have a ton of old cars?

[–] 7heo@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or the "rolling codes" have glaring implementation issues, but it is cheaper to ban the Flipper Zero than recall the cars, so the manufacturers made an executive decision... (⚠️ YouTube)

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 5 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

executive decision

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It also can't be used to hijack cars produced before the 1990s, since they mostly don't have keyless entry in the first place.

[–] febra@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Next, ban radio waves, because car companies are too damn dense to create a proper product lol

[–] sebinspace@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I’m surprised no fobs use a time-based token to prevent replay attacks. Would make it a bit of a bitch to replace the battery, but hey-ho, tradeoffs.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] JCreazy@midwest.social 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I doubt this is the real reason they are being banned, it's just the excuse they came up with.

[–] Labtec6@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

They just want to appear to be doing something, even though they aren't doing anything useful.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Oh man, since it is banned, there's no way at all that anybody can get their hands on it. No possible way. /s

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Fades@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s fucking bullshit wtf. This is exactly like bad gun reform that comes from someone who doesn’t know shit about the thing they are trying to reform

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Welcome to Canada. Turning dials that aren't connected to anything is the specialty of our "leaders".

[–] aeharding@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

The only thing our lawmakers know how to do is ban things to look like they're doing something when really they have no idea how to actually bring effectual change or fix the problems.

Flipper zero, foreign buyers, handguns....

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

That’s not how thieving works….

[–] Xavier@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

Honestly, I am embarrassed with the whole "look like were doing something" shtick by my government. An expensive gathering of decision makers from various sectors, a National Summit, just to say: we are now gonna be soooo tough on crime and let's ban the toy we just saw on TikTok.

Car theft was a major problem before 2010 until engine immobilizers became mandatory since 2007 on all vehicles made in Canada

Then everyone got too comfortable. The regulatory bodies and car manufacturers were too focused pretending doing some work and publishing all the buzzword-of-the-day "accomplishments" they were doing while patting each others backs without explicitely requiring manufacturers to comply/implement immediately anything. Meanwhile, manufacturers were happy to integrate almost off-the-shelf "children's RC" car starter pack obfuscated through invisible/non-existent security and protected under dubious industrial secrets.

Obviously, criminals smelled the easy money. Starting around 2013 — mystery car unlocking device | 2015 — signal repeater car burglary, car thefts by relay attacks were known by automakers but ignored as one-offs, too technical, already dealt with by law enforcement to lets pretent it's not that big of a problem or leave it to the police. Meanwhile, insurance claim replacement vehicles are selling like hotcakes and it is "convenient" to ignore the problem.

The following years various reprogramming theft become known and finally CAN bus injection — new form of keyless car theft that works in under 2 minutes or in depth investigation by Dr. Ken Tindell, becomes so easy, so cheap and widely available that even kids uses them to gain Youtube/TikTok followers.

Car hacking was a becoming serious concern during the pandemic, but now it's simply ridiculous and as if current automaker included/provided anti-theft/GPS tracking were (un)knowingly made "defective".

Hence, everyone is playing catch up and blaming left and right on who is responsible for this in-slow-motion public safety disaster.

Brian Kingston, president and CEO of the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers' Association, which includes Ford Motor Company of Canada, General Motors of Canada and Stellantis, said increasing the risk of prosecution is the most effective way to deter vehicle theft.

"And at the same time, providing more outbound inspection controls at the ports to prevent the flow of stolen vehicles to foreign markets by organized criminal organizations," he added.

New vehicle safety standards have been published (rushed?) recently. We will see if all the panic settles down like after 2007.

Moreover, the exponential prevalence of car theft also laid bare the incredibly poor and ineffective security at the various ports of Canada. Unsurprisingly, it has been a known constant devolution:

The devolution of port authorities in Canada has not been without debate over the past 70 years. This paper provides a brief introduction to the role of ports in Canada and then examines the history of port policy and devolution, concluding that past policies were considered to have failed due to their inability to respond to changing circumstances.

(Reposting my same reply for a similar thread about the Canadian Government banning the Flipper Zero, please check my post history for the other thread)

[–] Dasnap@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Never heard of these devices but now I kinda want one.

[–] epyon22@programming.dev 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

streisand effect they are going to be sold out everywhere now

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

They already were.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Personally, i would require car manufacturers to make their cars resistant to such trivial exploits, but this works too i guess

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] moistclump@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)
[–] ilost7489@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 year ago

It has a bunch of abilities, but the most important one is that it can recieve and transmit radio signals that can trick devices like remote door locks and garage door openers into thinking that a key was pressed to open them, but only if they don't have proper security systems set up. It's built for penetration testing on systems to see how secure they are

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Shenanigore@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's all Trudeau has been good for, for years, attempting to appear to do something about a problem but never, never, ever, actually fixing anything, but also inconveniencing/ removing rights or making criminals out of ancillary people to the actual issue.

[–] golden_zealot@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is our government in a nutshell. Don't like guns? Ban them from licensed owners instead of working against smuggling or changing the license requirement from a PAL to an RPAL. Don't like gas cars? Ban them instead of working on public transit and infrastructure. Don't like the flipper zero? Ban it instead of either licensing purchase and use like a billion other radio devices that exist, or holding car manufacturers responsible for ass security practices.

Can't wait to find out what they don't like next, I wonder what they'll do? /s

[–] Player2@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good thing I ordered one a couple days ago

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

This has made me think that I should order one too. Must be a good tool if it needs to be made illegal.

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Um.... You don't even need the flipper zero to steal a car. I'm not even sure it's strong enough to emulate the key.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] quaddo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

“This here’s the Lockpocking Lawyer, and today we’re going to take a closer look at the Flipper Zero….”

load more comments
view more: next ›