this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
38 points (93.2% liked)

[Dormant, please move to !television@lemm.ee] Movies and TV Shows

2720 readers
1 users here now

Please move to

This is a community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

  1. Keep discussion civil and on topic.
  2. Please do not link to pirated content.
  3. No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
  4. Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Such an impactful movie. I think the length of the movie really made it. They could have been a little more clear and elaborate at the end about what happened to the people involved. I didn't keep track of the years, and 1957 and other years they mentioned meant nothing to me. I went and read the Wikipedia of King and Earnest, and that made me feel a lot more shock and anger than the end of the movie. Overall a haunting masterpiece. What did you think of it?

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dditty@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a Scorsese movie so of course everything about it was expertly done. I especially enjoyed the physicality Leo brought to his role which I haven't seen him do before, Lily Gladstone definitely stole the show and I hope she gets the Oscar for her performance. I thought the radio drama ending felt a little out of place, however, and I could've used an intermission tbh

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I watched it at home, but didn't take a bathroom break lol

[–] dditty@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I saw it pre-release in the theaters and didn't take a bathroom break either, but I also planned ahead and didn't drink any fluids for a few hours beforehand

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Well I didn't plan for it, but my ADHD ass chose to forget I need to pee.

[–] stanka@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was a really good movie, but paints Earnest as much more of a patsy than I came away with after the book. Also, the book reveals that this was one such story and the magnitude of the deaths was even more obscene.

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah the first thing that came to mind was, how is he so dumb?

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Something is wrong with me. I turned it off after 30 minutes, I was incredibly bored.

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Slow burn movies are not for everyone. May be also depends on your mood going in. I started watching it a week ago, and closed out in the first 5 mins because I started too late in the night and was not fresh enough to get immersed into it.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Great movie. I thought it was some sort of Utopian fiction at the start

Unfortunately theres a law prohibiting teachers in Oklahoma from talking about the Osage murders

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Not really true.

House Bill 1775 passed in 2021. It prohibits educators from teaching that an individual is inherently racist or oppressive based on their race, an individual bears responsibility for actions committed in the past by other members of the same race, or that any individual should feel discomfort or guilt based on race.

While that's a shit law, I can't see it stopping teaching this. It's an intentionally vague law that needs tested in court.

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Really?! That's fucked up