this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
36 points (97.4% liked)

PC Gaming

11401 readers
876 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] randombullet@programming.dev 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ah, Perfect for scrambling eyes

Edit: Eggs

[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Could probably cook an eye on it too

[–] herrvogel@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Nice. In a few more generations my home office should be able to double as my boiler room.

[–] hydroel@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is what surprises me with this announcement: we moved a while ago from a more powerful, limited number of cores to smaller, more numerous, and less consuming cores. Power consumption increases to the square of the frequency of the processor, so what is the advantage of moving away from that model?

[–] Ross_audio@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Headlines.

No one should buy this.

[–] xilliah@beehaw.org 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Remember when their clock speeds went up every year?

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago

Power meter goes brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.

[–] palarith@aussie.zone 9 points 1 year ago

Nice. Should be hot enough to make coffee

[–] dukatos@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is P4 vs Athlon all over again.

[–] RippleEffect@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Didn't we see something similar in the fx days, with amd being the loser?

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Intel adopted a fast release cycle after the Netburst P4 days. They were able to stay dominant until they dumped that strategy in like 2017.

[–] LoremIpsumGenerator@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Rubanski@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago
[–] qaz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Don’t worry about missing out on the performance of the 14900KS for gaming, though, as the cheaper Ryzen 7 7800X3D is likely to be just as quick, if not more so, in many games.

Sounds great, but based on what?

[–] WanderingCat@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Fastest ever stock CPU sure. But I believe there was some old AMD CPU that got overclocked to more than 8Ghz!