this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
67 points (93.5% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

61226 readers
562 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As much as I like radarr, lidarr has some problems radarr doesn't. Some bands nowadays do not release albums and directly release singles on YouTube or Spotify, so the albums organization doesn't work that well anymore.

On top of that, the content you find in the trackers is very heterogeneous, entire albums as a single track, discographies as zip files, different file formats, single albums... and it seems to confuse lidarr all the time so it cannot figure out what is what.

What do you use for your music collections? How do you organize them?

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SafetyGoggles@feddit.de 25 points 2 years ago

That's not Lidarr's fault though. Lidarr gets the data from MusicBrainz, and MusicBrainz is very community driven. So if no one adds data to it, they won't have the data automatically.

Also, the music piracy scene is just not as standardised as movie and TV shows. It's hard to automate when every releaser uses different naming format.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago

Lidarr and I contribute to musicbrainz if it aint there so it will be made available to lidarr

[–] romano@lemmy.shtuf.eu 4 points 2 years ago

Just MusicBrainz and a general music folder. I either use a SMB share or Navidrome to listen to my library, depending what's most convenient. I've noticed that Lidarr generates huge traffic spikes when it fetches album info, rate limiting it on my Pi Hole, so I've stopped using it. I don't like the idea of automating downloading music anyway, I prefer to listen to it first then download if I like it.

[–] Cyanogenmon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Soulseeker for some excellent yo-ho-ho and honestly iTunes for management.

[–] wolfshadowheart@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Well since so far no one has suggested any solutions (and I'm not aware of an alternative to Lidarr that suits my needs) but I also have noticed a similar problem. Many albums download fine, but there's times where the whole artist downloads each 01 01 01 track and it gets complicated.

I believe outside of manually doing it we'd be looking for filebot, but that's paid, or possibly some sorting tools available through foobar2000 plugins - I'm not sure if it exists here but many others must.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago

Yea it's tough there's actually a huge drop off of the rr suite after radarr, sonarr and prowlarr.