Paywall! But the title just seems like an obvious conclusion.
this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
44 points (97.8% liked)
Linguistics
1132 readers
8 users here now
Welcome to the community about the science of human Language!
Everyone is welcome here: from laypeople to professionals, Historical linguists to discourse analysts, structuralists to generativists.
Rules:
- Instance rules apply.
- Be reasonable, constructive, and conductive to discussion.
- Stay on-topic, specially for more divisive subjects. And avoid unnecessary mentioning topics and individuals prone to derail the discussion.
- Post sources when reasonable to do so. And when sharing links to paywalled content, provide either a short summary of the content or a freely accessible archive link.
- Avoid crack theories and pseudoscientific claims.
- Have fun!
Related communities:
- !linguistics_humor@sh.itjust.works
- !languagelearning@sopuli.xyz
- !conlangs@mander.xyz
- !esperanto@sopuli.xyz
- !japaneselanguage@sopuli.xyz
- !latin@lemm.ee
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
The title is kind of obvious, but the conclusion of the article is interesting: that we should be taking into account the social aspects of linguistic relativity, not just the individual ones.
if anyone has this pls share.
Suggestion/idea: you could add the link to the original post.
done
Thank you!
thank you very much!
In Entish, anything that's worth saying is worth taking your time to say it.
Yo juego a futbol y al Monopoli.
And I learned Spanish in high school, so some paper this is.