this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
325 points (97.4% liked)

politics

24177 readers
3529 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The billionaire also told the outlet that he plans to vote for former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley in the Texas GOP primary Tuesday as “a protest vote against Trump,” but that he would still support the current president versus the former one.

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 112 points 1 year ago (2 children)

From the headline, I thought they were talking about a random Cuban-American citizen.

[–] criticon@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

Same, I though maybe a Cuban community leader from Florida or something, I was confused about the quote about Texas

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't give a shit what a billionaire says with their mouth in public. What the fuck is their money doing?

[–] donescobar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ever heard of Cost Plus Drugs?

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You mean loss-leader pharmacy with a built-in profit margin that abuses the fact that the United States doesn't have universal healthcare? Oh yeah, real nice of him. I'm sure the profits from that will make him even more of a billionaire.

[–] brlemworld@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Sitting in the stock market oppressing the working class

[–] CuriousRefugee@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I misread the headline as "only if he was being given last rites," and was confused until I actually clicked the article. Made me think of people who supposedly only converted to believing in a god on their deathbeds, when suddenly it seemed like it mattered to them.

"Family and friends, good father, forgive me for my stubbornness, and bring me a ballot so that I may change my vote upon seeing the light." ~Markus Cubano, Nov. 2024

[–] tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm still not convinced that's not what the headline says.

Do deliberately vague headlines drive clicks?

[–] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Mark Cuban, the former owner of the Dallas Mavericks, said he would cast his vote for President Biden over former President Trump in November, even if “he was being given last rites.”

“If they were having his last wake, and it was him versus Trump, and he was being given last rites, I would still vote for Joe Biden,” Cuban told Bloomberg News in a piece released Monday, referring to a Catholic tradition of praying over someone who is close to death.

The billionaire also told the outlet that he plans to vote for former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley in the Texas GOP primary Tuesday as “a protest vote against Trump,” but that he would still support the current president versus the former one.

Cuban, an investor of the hit show “Shark Tank,” has been a vocal critic of the former president in recent years, praising his ban from Twitter, now X, and other social media in the wake of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, saying it was “the right thing to do.”

Cuban also shot down speculation that he himself would run for president back in November, stating he had “no plans” to do so in an email to NBC News, despite toying with the idea in the past.

Back in 2020, he said that while there wasn’t much of a chance for him in a race for the Oval Office, he had not “closed the door” on the idea.


The original article contains 359 words, the summary contains 245 words. Saved 32%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Well, Mark Cuban is one of the few people who could honestly say Biden has all his best interests at heart.

He's a billionaire, "fiscally conservative", and supports Israel's genocide against Palestinians.

That's like the only demographic Biden is doing really well with.

It's like saying the leader of the KKK is voting trump, yeah, we didn't need an article telling us that.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's rare to see a comment so divisive and engaging at the same time.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

If it makes you feel better, wanting to hold politicians accountable regardless of party is the most popular view.

It just pisses off republicans and neoliberals equally.

Kind of a win/win situation.

It's just not always easy to tell why someone is mad. Unless they explicitly say, it's pretty hard to tell the difference between a Biden and trump supporter online.

[–] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I feel you missed out a lot of things that Biden as done well and went out of your way to describe Biden as closely as possible to Trump.

Sometimes billionaires and people don't want a crazy insurrectionist in office.

[–] RampageDon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I know lots of dems are mad at Biden, but it's like they forgot what happened two elections ago. People were mad that Hilary was forced down their throats and didn't like her as a candidate. They didn't vote for her out of protest and look what happened. I've been hearing more and more the same kind of talk this election cycle. No one likes being forced to vote for a candidate, and they should certainly have a better campaign than, "Well look at the alternative," but not voting for Biden is basically voting for Trump. Primaries are absolutely the time to make a protest vote, but let's not fall for this nonsense again. Biden is not handling the Palestine/Isreal problem well but the alternative would be even worse.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

This is like abused spouse logic...

Why be mad at voters and not the people who keep putting up bad candidates?

I'm not sure if you remember 08, but the party fought Obama hard and there was a big campaign for neoliberals to vote R, which they did.

But it wasn't enough because lots of non voters turned out and became voters. They just needed a candidate they truly believed would help them.

And Obama was/is really good at convincing people of that.

Biden and Hillary aren't.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Sometimes billionaires and people don’t want a crazy insurrectionist in office.

They often dont.

But when our only two options is "batshit crazy social/conservative fiscal" and "conservative social/conservative fiscal".

It kind of gives us a problem.

No matter what party wins, the billionaires win.

We just have to decide if we want social progress to roll back, or stay the same.

Which is why 1/3 of the country doesn't vote. And why Obama flipped a bunch of red states his first term.

We can run progressives and easily win elections and get stuff done. Or we can run neoliberals and pray they beat the Republican in a coin flip election.