Tyler and his groups aren't anarchists, though, they're fascists.
this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2022
1 points (100.0% liked)
Piracy News
1226 readers
1 users here now
The Piracy community here on Lemmy and Reddit went to 💩 so I take over 🚤 🏴☠.
About
PN community is focused on news, laws, apps, history and everything connected to digital and real-world piracy.
We do not say piracy is in general right nor wrong. Please keep that in mind.
It is up to you if you use given info and links or not.
50 6C 65 61 73 65 6B 65 65 70 74 68 65 70 69 65 63 65
Community Rules
- If you do not like this community, then consider blocking
!piracynews. - No direct links to illegal streaming stuff, which means websites that explicitly stream content, such as movies, audio or live footage.
- No Reddit Mods, who take legit stuff down. See paradox of tolerance.
- FOSS based tools are preferred due to malware + trust reasons. I see less and less reasons to prefer closed if there are solid FOSS alternatives.
- Submitted URLs must be shortened via tinu.be. Trolling or abusing this will result in a community ban. This must be done to maintain plausible deniability.
- You must submit a screenshot of submitted tool or website and provide a minimal description.
- Resubmission are only allowed if original URL changed, or there was a link update, 404 etc.
- No NSFW of any kind. I do not want to lure pedos and other sickos into this community.
- For lots of URLs submissions use base64, or the URL encoder.
- Respect original authors submission, no disrespectful behavior is tolerated.
- For DMCA please eMail or DM me first.
- No NSFW of any kind.
- Do not shit-talk community members, other members or the mods behind their back and then show up in here like nothing happend.
- No what this have to do with... questions, or straight ban, take the news or info or leave it alone.
- No URLs with tracking code e.g. AMP, clean links only.
- No Hitler or Vaccine stuff, history only allowed regarding Piracy not politics or social things.
Guild Image Credits
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Not according to this discussion.
They are on the opposite ends of the Politcal spectrum. One, Anarchy, is the belief that there should be no government at all while the other, fascism, is the belief that the government should control Everything.
Tyler want to control it himself, not give it up. So anarchist is correct.
No, Tyler is the representation of repressed homosexuality and the desire for an idealized idea of masculinity, which is being erradicated by LGBTQ and what not, to come back, shit's more obvious in the book.
Not sure what LGBTO, homosexuality has something to do with anarchy. Absolute nothing.
Well, anarchy strives to be as horizontal as possible, so the elimination of social constructs is to be desired if you support it. Still, it has nothing to do with anarchism in the film, it has to do with fascism. Watch the video.
Maybe watch the movie and not a video about random people that watched the movie and give their opinion on that, the destruction clearly symbolizes fall of social structures which is clearly anarchy not fascism.
Giroux and Szeman identify Tyler Durden as a failed icon of the revolution whose public appeal is more due to his cult personality than any "strengths of an articulated, democratic notion of political reform." Durden acts instead of thinking and thereby fails to envision democratic movements; he is described as "a holdover of early-twentieth-century fascism". While the narrator represents the crisis of capitalism as a crisis of masculinity, Tyler Durden represents "redemption of masculinity repackaged as the promise of violence in the interests of social and political anarchy".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretations_of_Fight_Club
There is also an opinion or interpretation of fascism but no one I know interprets it that way. Most people see destruction - anarchy, which also was my first impression when I saw the movie.
Maybe watch the video which gives proper facts about why the film is about that. Yes, most people see it that way because they are white cis men who see whatever is on top because it pleases them more and don't read the sub text. The section in that Wikipedia article is exactly what I'm referrencing to and the video makes it even clearer. But okay, let's agree on disagreeing.
I already did and most of it are opinions from others. Why value their opinions over mine or your own... As already linked via wikipedia the movie can be interpreted differently and there are more opinions on that. Your link does not change the fact here.
But okay, let’s agree on disagreeing.
Yop. 🙏
My key argument simply is that the whole argumentation for fags and other now mentioned stuff was mentioned AFTER years. The things is most people just did not see it that way even if the author intended something different because afterwards I also can claim xyz but the audience, and most people I talked about saw it clearly as anarchy. It is similar with my Matrix example, at that time NO ONE saw any connection to transgender but now after Hollywood got a shit-blast they make it as an argument and suddenly all was about that, which is also not the case and not what most people saw.
An important thing to consider here is the fact that in both cases, Palahniuk came out as homosexual 6 years after the film, and the Wachowski sisters as transexuals also years after the release, in my opinion this affects their works because it can imply new possible interpretations where it would have been harder to find if a European white upper class man would have directed the film. Things that before would have seemed impossible are now reasonable trains of thought.