Technology

87 readers

2 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago

Some people have a problem that upvotes and likes even exist. And I would go further. (media.kbin.social)

submitted 1 year ago by look997@kbin.social to c/tech@kbin.social

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Some people have a problem that upvotes and likes even exist.
And I would go further.
A chip in the brain that reads what you think and feel about a given entry, and automatically adds a reaction based on your thoughts and feelings.
Because not everyone wants to click like, and they think about something once they've read it.
And even writing a comment by AI, based on what the chip reads.
AI puts the read brain flashes into words.

top 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] lemonflavoured@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you, Elon Musk.

[–] Septimaeus 1 points 1 year ago

It is an interesting concept, and we have the technology in its nascent form. However the “filter” people develop for social interaction is too essential for the individual and society in their current form, to bypass with technology across the board. Sentiment analysis certainly has utility, and I’m not concerned about its use in controlled environments with consent of all parties, but human socialization as it exists today depends on, and is informed by, the selective intimation of private emotions.

What this proposal means to address is, I suspect, the bandwidth restriction of that selective process — i.e., considering human communication as akin to interfaces of nodes in a network, would it not be far more efficient if everyone knew exactly how others felt about things all the time? The trouble is that the bandwidth restriction between nodes regulates propagation of data in the network intelligently. It is governed by the nodes themselves to, ultimately, avoid unnecessary loss of nodes or network density. Removing that governor using technology results in far fewer nodes, each of which have far fewer connections on average.

That is, it destroys society.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Brought to us by Shat GPT.