Now for the followup question:
Will these ads be in the form of namedropping corporations and products as the "official government sponsor/provider/service" or will it be in the form of an ever-changing constitution that due to its ephemeral nature can only exist digitally and will require a 30-second ad to access?
Its kinda funny how this bill is being introduced under the premise of "protecting children" but Girls Gone Wild is still allowed to operate after getting caught multiple times distributing child pornography
And by funny obviously I mean horrifying
That was the plan in 2020. Unfortunately, the vaccine didn't work properly and instead of turning people trans it just turned them into magnets.
Oopsies
It was too hard to get ahead as a straight white dude and I wanted some of that woke privilege
“snarfing" and "throbber" are two of my favorite niche tech terms
And why should I be more worried about a hypothetical psyop that i might experience than the current psyops that I am experiencing?
Sure it made the training process faster, but this still takes a fraction of the energy to generate a single output compared to other LLMs like ChatGPT or Llama. Plus it's open source. You can't discredit a technological advancement for building upon previous advancement, especially when doing so with transparency.
Unfortunately that's just a danger on the internet. Stupid users are gonna get scammed whether it's a stock trading AI that empties your bank account when you link it or a Nigerian Prince who just needs $5000 so he can unlock his fortune and repay you $100,000.
Even then, what national security upending information does the average citizen have stored on their phone that they're just whimsically uploading anywhere that'll take a PDF? Like I said, I understand restrictions on devices used by government officials for official purposes, but to ban it unilaterally for civilian use as well seems excessive.
Then you should've specified that those were the parameters you wanted. Answers and thought processes will vary based on the prompt provided.
My point is that you can still use creative prompting to get answers you want that should be blocked due to its safety constraints. My point isn't that there's no guidelines to work around.
I'm not an AI researcher nor do I work professionally with AI so I'm not familiar with 100% of the background processes involved with these LLMs but if the question is "can you get Deepseek to talk about Tiananmen Square" then the answer is yes.
Electric cars and Huawei are two recent examples off the top of my head
The most logical approach I can think of would be starting up an instance, flooding it with bots, and using those bots to spread to other instances.
However I don't use Lemmy super often but from what I understand intance admins can block other instances so it wouldn't kill Lemmy entirely, it would just make it worse to use, which is a detriment because the most-cited reason I see for not getting involved in fediverse apps seems to be the learning curve upon entry. Open instances would be flooded with bots and all actively maintained instances would need to start isolating themselves from other instances and heavily screen who gets in