AMoralNihilist

joined 2 years ago
[–] AMoralNihilist@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

The poor placement of "people having sex with hats on" makes it appear like the x-axis label. Which implies that there are >1900 people.

[–] AMoralNihilist@feddit.uk 50 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

Interesting article, clearly written with an extreme bias.

It definitely makes some extravagant claims that are not thoroughly backed up.

This definitely doesn't belong in TIL. It is not an established fact, and if it is an established fact, a medium article from a strongly biased author is not a reliable source for it.

TIL the US committed mass war crimes in Korea resulting in a 20% population reduction is maybe more apt. But it still requires a better source than this article. Such as an academic paper or article which includes references to reliable sources.

[–] AMoralNihilist@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah my bad, didn't realise he was being held in a prison. The article linked is just a tiny snippet so I was missing context.

[–] AMoralNihilist@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

It's not el Salvador's responsibility to transport him back to the US.

I don't think he is being stopped from leaving, but it's up to the US to make it right, not El Salvador

EDIT: it wasn't clear from the article that he was being held in a prison. My bad on that.

Absolutely should be released, but it is still not on El Salvador to send him to the US.

[–] AMoralNihilist@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think it's a good point. The hypocrisy and double standards have really come to the fore in the past 3 years.

However, I think it's partially due to a lack of empathy/inability to understand the desperation that drives some parts of the war machine, survive at any cost.

Land mines are a horror of war that bite long after the conflict ends. They are also one of the most cost effective ways of slowing/containing a large scale enemy assault.

Personally, I don't know where I stand on this news, existential threats shift viewpoints drastically.

I think it's fair to say: we should not use landmines, we should wish for other countries to not use them. However, I don't think that they should be demonised. And they should be used as "reasonably" as possible. (E.g. securing a border or military base, not near a residential area). Of course when survival comes into play, soldiers will do what they feel they need to at the end of the day, and who are we to judge from the comfort of our screens?

[–] AMoralNihilist@feddit.uk 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Absolutely it should be celebrated.

Once enough users are here, you can join a niche small instance that doesn't federate with as many mainstream ones to get that small community vibe. (Or better yet, make your own instance to build what you want)

The more people using federated social media instead of single-entity controlled social media the better for society.

[–] AMoralNihilist@feddit.uk 22 points 5 months ago (3 children)

He did it twice. And it was very clear.

[–] AMoralNihilist@feddit.uk 23 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I would add that I think checking out and joining smaller instances is also a great opportunity. Distributes the user load across servers and being one of fewer voices in an instance means you have a bigger say in who you federate with. You also get to be a third party instance to most of the big drama and don't get judged just for your instance as much

Edit: also, if you like your instance, contribute to it!

[–] AMoralNihilist@feddit.uk 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think the only time martial law can be seen as reasonable is in an outright state of war. And even then, only when it's existential.

It's kind of inherently the antithesis of democratic values.

[–] AMoralNihilist@feddit.uk 28 points 6 months ago

I'm so annoyed at coverage of these issues and the economy as a whole. Journalists have to use the biggest numbers they can to make people think it's important.

Ok a 64% reduction in profits is not good. But that also means that the company is still profitable and wants to fire the thousands of people, and in so doing harm the local economy, that gave it massive profits for decades.

A 64% reduction in profits cannot be the company making a loss. Yet the article claims that BMW and Mercedes are "also making similar large losses".

Shareholders have been robbing employees blind for decades, and the second it gets a little bit less profitable we have to fire thousands of people?

And yes, I understand there must be some consideration of future proofing costs against a shrinking consumer base, but such drastic measures are solely aimed at preservation of shareholder dividends and value (see Boeing).

[–] AMoralNihilist@feddit.uk 44 points 7 months ago (2 children)

https://www.khanacademy.org/

Helped me get through my engineering degree. Absolutely the best maths education I've ever seen.

[–] AMoralNihilist@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's the final positions in the group. bottom to top, 1st to 4th

 

Hey every(any?)one,

Thought I'd get it started here as I don't think I'll be going back to reddit, but I'd love to get an alternative.

I've seen the kbin nufc community, but I thought maybe the UK feddit would be a better place for an nufc community.

Is anyone even here? 😂

view more: next ›