Apathy

joined 2 years ago
[–] Apathy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

What is wrong with saying the US is synonymous to federal court? The experts are using evidence from a period that has been proven to be controversial so why would I not question a source provided from that period.

You’re questioning my age and knowledge level while I’m trying to understand your perspective; you sound like you’re lacking EQ but it is alright, all that preaching for a sovereign nation that is a systemic disaster will get you where you want to be.

[–] Apathy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This is from 2014? With sources from the earlier 2000s? If the US can be as openly bias at it is now, what’s preventing them from pushing a narrative earlier on?

[–] Apathy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Is it not known that the US is biased about its state of Israel? Getting a source from the US is like asking North Korean if Kim Jung Un is the greatest and expecting a answer otherwise

[–] Apathy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

People are not understanding that there is a hard-on for conservatives when it comes to foreigners/immigrants so they’ll spread those article even with misinformation involved because as your sources show, not much “news” about those stabbing albeit how recent they are

[–] Apathy@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

War about to be real scary 2fast5me

[–] Apathy@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

The start of a global market crash 😔

[–] Apathy@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Words are a sequence of sounds, that’s why we learn those sequences from a young age because it is easier to adapt to these new sounds and take key elements to try and create a relational? Dataset / database. That’s one of the beauty of different languages in life.

Because you are conveying this “illusionary” convo in the stated database that is familiar to some, we are able to convey those same sounds back to you to form a conversation.

To an individual who has not learnt the “English” language all our words sounds gibberish.

This is my opinion

[–] Apathy@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Mention of AQWorlds and private servers? What year is this! Were you a lurker or member of the CE forum or Stylin-on.me? 😉

[–] Apathy@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I wrote my reply help asleep but I was thinking about Malaysia; apologies on that part but if you require a list of countries

Morocco Tunisia Malaysia Indonesia UAE ( they’ve since removed / limited a lot of their sharia based law ) Kazakhstan Lebanon Bosnia and Herzegovina

The mention of “false prophet” is subjective so I won’t get into that. If you go to Israel and question the “messiah” I’m sure you’re bound to get similar results

It is at the end of the day all about leadership and as of this moment the leaders are regressive in those Muslim countries you listed but that is changing and will continue to change with time; maybe not for the kingdoms

As for Muslims not giving opinion of the subject of others committing heinous crimes in the name of Islam, that’s untrue as I’ve seen here in NY a lot of disgust and condemnation of those extremism.

Is it not the Christians in America that are moving the democratic sovereignty to a theocratic one?

The biggest threat to America today is not communism. It’s moving America toward a fascist theocracy. Everything that’s happened under the Reagan Administration is steering us right down that pipe.

  • Frank Zappa

Let us work towards a future where religion plays a background subject.

[–] Apathy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

Again nitpicking;

You are looking at the extreme ends of Muslim / Islam countries

There are “democratic” countries that are not as extreme like Malaysia and Brunei or even Indonesia.

Edited : out Singapore; see reply below for correction.

To me it seems like you are just looking at Iran/Iraq and such when you mention that religion so it will most definitely look like that. I do agree at its current stage Islam is fostering a lot of extremist beliefs but there have been period with different leaders where things looked way progressive comparatively.

You cannot judge something that is almost immemorial from a single point of view as they all go through periods of change.

From my understanding in a world with 3 theocratic religion it has always been Judaism and Christianity vs Islam so of course you only hear and see bad and never the good when the overall big picture is messed up.

I personally am in favor of destruction of all religion but I also understand why they exist.

I am stating it again, try doing those same action in a state with a lot of Zionist believers or orthodox Christian’s and see what happens. I am not asking you to change your view but rather see it from an open prospective if you are going to try defending any religion at all.

[–] Apathy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

I agree that religion extremism is trash but your comparison is as dog water. Try doing the same type of thing to a Torah or a bible; watch what happens. You cannot compare one subject to another

There are extremist for every religion and you are just nitpicking. If someone is openly instigating then they will obviously face the consequence from the zealot.

Don’t spread shitty logic like that; it’s a deterrent to a open minded logic

[–] Apathy@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Mullvad VPN

view more: next ›