Camille

joined 2 years ago
[–] Camille@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well... not my culture, I guess 🤷‍♀️

[–] Camille@lemmy.ml 24 points 8 months ago (4 children)
[–] Camille@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

Gotta lower that back if she wants any gains

[–] Camille@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago

Les mecs vous pissez déjà fluo, ptet pas besoin de clignoter des oreilles non plus. C'est incroyable la quantité de produits différents qu'ils arrivent à s'injecter avant de finir en sharpie. Je suis fascinée

[–] Camille@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

She slays tho

[–] Camille@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Well, if your compiler knows the old value is unused afterwards, it can just modify the parameters you want and return the object as is. And if you're really manipulating non-mutable objects, shallow copies should be enough to replicate an object + a few modifications. I don't have everything in mind but once the semantics of your program has been checked by the compiler and it starts emitting lower-level code, it can cheat a lot to optimize things out

[–] Camille@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Your compiler is allowed to optimize things tho

[–] Camille@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Yes indeed, my eyes couldn't see it for a moment x)

[–] Camille@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I thought the shark was a plane and didn't understand the title... Morning's hard today

[–] Camille@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I did show this meme to my boyfriend once, he agreed. Then months later he met my parents. We played him for an absolute foul haha

[–] Camille@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago

Given the amount of time I spend participating in the podcast this way, I would rather say that I sometimes pause my thoughts for a little podcast rather than the opposite

[–] Camille@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

I never thought about dissociating this way :O I'll give it a try next time I feel the meltdown coming

view more: next ›