Chaf

Awesome! That recipe sounds really nice!

One thing that has been going through my mind, but I didn't mention in my earlier reply: another approach would be to look at what you eat in the morning and trying to get similar macronutrients, i.e. do you usually eat more protein, carbohydrates or fats in the morning. Then you could try to find a mix that fits for you. But seems like you have it figured out :)

Like eating vegan is something regular people do.

I get what you mean, but it's phrased a bit weirdly 🙃

True, that's what they propose in the article, but it's not like you get pure wood powder back, it's a wood-epoxy powder mixture. To which you then add epoxy to make new stuff... at some point you just have a mass of epoxy with traces of wood. That's downcycling at best.

Not sure how serious/scientific the author of the article is, as they also propose using the powder as mulch, which sounds like an ecological nightmare when considering that it's mixed with epoxy. But that might not have been the idea of the engineers who designed the wooden blades.

I'm not saying this technology is bad, even if the wooden blades get burned in the end at least they are not left as landfill like the ones right now.

Recyclable doesn't mean that it's worth recycling them. Look for "wind turbine graveyards" (but also beware, there seem to be a lot of AI generated images -.-).

However I also don't see how these wooden versions are much better. According to the article they are glued together using epoxy. They propose grinding it down and making other stuff with it. I guess in the best case it gets burned in the end.

Not at all! However I'm not sure if I'm the best person for that, my breakfast eating habits aren't the best, I'd say :D

I've been raised with eating cake for breakfast, as my mother really likes to bake. Or, if there was no cake, bread (the german kind, I guess that might make a difference from a nutritional point of view) with marmalade. This caused me to also pick up baking and experiment with recipes to make vegan versions of them, which was a lot of fun and is now a new hobby.

Other than that, I usually drink black tea during breakfast, as I don't drink coffee.

But most important is that you find your own "rhythm". Eating habits and needs differ a lot between people. A friend of mine gets really hangry if they don't eat a small snack every few hours in between meals. I can go for half a day without eating, but then also eat way too much afterwards.

Guess who is also arguing under this post? What a surprise...

Sometimes I'm wondering why I'm even engaging in these discussions at all. By now it's probably just because I've reiterated the statements so often, that I just have the sources easily available, but I always know the outcome before I even post an answer. Such people aren't really interested in actually discussing veganism.

Nice shifting of the goal post! At first it's too expensive, now it doesn't have the right density and takes too much time to prepare?

Apart from that, you already get most of your nutrition from plants: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/calorie-supply-by-food-group

This is not because people don't eat as much meat, but rather because meat is really inefficient in providing energy when it comes down to farm area.

Veganism might not solve all our problems, but it's an easy way of getting rid of a lot of environmental problems. Apart from the direct impacts, we could start regrowing the amazon forest instead of cutting it down even further https://ourworldindata.org/what-has-driven-deforestation-in-the-21st-century

I do agree, that it's - depending on where you live, the USA is really fucked up - not always easy to switch to being vegan, but it's definitely a societal problem, not a technical one.

Then what are you even trying to fix? I just see you arguing against veganism, not proposing anything else.

That's what you get if you chose actual scientists as ministers of energy. Proper politics directed towards decarbonizing in a sustainable way. I'm jealous.

Yes and no. It is possible for someone earning 70k/year to emit below the average (let's also keep in mind that the goal is not to be below the average, but to be at 0 emissions/impact), but everything you can buy has a CO2/environment-cost related to it.

As soon as you spend more, you have a higher impact. Of course there are more and less impactful ways of consumption, so you do raise a good point, but we're not going to consume our way out of this misery.

A really nice book I shove down the throat of every single one of my friends who's not running away fast enough is The Day the World Stops Shopping, in case you have way too much time at hand ^^

It's not like those major social media sites don't have some kind of data center (or rent one) in every "major" (population wise) timezone they operate in. Your other arguments still hold true, but I think even then it would be better for all of us if those websites went down every now and then.

Yeah, that's surely gonna work. As if the people dying from the heat right now aren't too many already. I'm somewhat sure you're not being serious, and while I see where you're coming from, that would be treating symptoms at best. As long as society doesn't fundamentally change, other "high consumers" would emerge again, and we'd be back where we started