ChaoticEntropy

joined 2 years ago
[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 17 points 1 day ago

Surround yourself on all sides with enemies and then you barely have to aim.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago

I guess if Big Calculator was lobbying for children to no longer be taught any maths but for calculators to ask other calculators questions and have the student move answers between them.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

That sounds like a way to make a generation of students wholly reliant on AI, much to Altman's delight. People are going to still need to know how to do stuff in the future and not just how to request the answers to things from somewhere else.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I really wanted the hat on the cat. :(

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 33 points 6 days ago

Spotify furious that they aren't getting their cut.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What about all the fratboys?

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago

Wherever you put it?

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago

Every 6 months half of it gets removed, to use as fertiliser, and it is refilled with tap water and some feed.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 0 points 2 weeks ago

It sounded cool a couple of years ago, but it was first installed in 2021 and I'm yet to hear of it really going anywhere.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Hawaii state Senator Joy Buenaventura, who is typically a supporter of gun control measures, said the bill would criminalize existing owners of assault rifles, per Hawaii News Now.

She said: "Now, by their mere possession, because we decide to pass this bill, we decide to label them as criminals and that to me, it's unethical and should not be tolerated by this body."

However, Senate Judiciary chair Karl Rhoads disagreed with this take on the bill saying it allowed for "grandfathering."

Sooo... which is it?

But yeah. Obviously America should do this.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The point being that you can't be tried for the same crime by different courts at the same time, one court has to take precedence and run the full process to its conclusion. Also the "Not Guilty" plea isn't to say he didn't commit a crime but that they won't admit "Guilty" to what has been proposed as the crime(s) and then be instantly hit with whatever the prosecution wants, i.e. death penalty. The process needs to play out legitimately, and will likely lead to conviction but of crime(s) and with a sentence that is more acceptable to the defence.

If you shoplifted and then are charged with a laundry list of crimes in addition to and more severe than theft, that would result in vastly more severe consequences, you're probably not going to put in a "Guilty" plea for that list.

view more: next ›