Yeah... victory belonging to the person with the widest reach and deepest pockets rather than the originator of the material/idea is one way to ensure that all creatives become paupers. This is one of those many on-paper ideas that, without the upheaval of pretty much every other established human social structure, would be awful in practice.
ChaoticEntropy
"You'll never stop us! Hahaha! Not unless you declare martial law, institute an authoritarian crackdown, and proscribe the democratic party!"
They left a note saying "this group made me do it, retaliate against them".
"Do you regret this happening to other people at all, or just you?"
"Not a registered Republican? Or the wrong sort of registered Republican? Well I feel justified in killing you in retribution for a random media figure being shot and killed by... someone. Because frdm."
Retribution against who, exactly...? Who do they randomly want to lynch in the street? Just the next person they see with hair that's too long/short in their view? Maybe they want to shoot up some more gay bars...?
I certainly didn't watch anything so ghoulish, but the transcript in reporting was him midway through a Q&A section with someone challenging his stance on the recent trans school shooting, and making implications about him taking a hardline stance on that whilst taking no stance on others. His answer to "how many school shootings in the last 10 years have involved a trans person?" was "too many"... the most eye rollingly evasive answer possible.
They're communing with Satan, I hear!
Oh wow, we're really hitting all the classics.
I wouldn't be surprised if it was someone just more right wing than him who took issue with "softer" stances, like not murdering trans people in the streets and only criminalising them.
He was literally in the middle of defending his stance on why trans people are bad, and dodging questions on gun violence, when this happened. Bizarre.
Everyone without a 5090 should immediately refund the game and use these remarks as the justification.