ChemicalRascal

joined 2 years ago
[–] ChemicalRascal@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago (8 children)

The problem with that approach is that the resulting AI doesn't contain any identifiable "copies" of the material that was used to train it. No copying, no copyright. The AI model is not a legally recognizable derivative work.

That's a HUGE assumption you've made, and certainly not something that has been tested in court, let alone found to be true.

In the context of existing legal precedent, there's an argument to be made that the resulting model is itself a derivative work of the copyright-protected works, even if it does not literally contain an identifiable copy, as it is a derivative of the work in the common meaning of the term.

If the future output of the model that happens to sound very similar to the original voice actor counts as a copyright violation, then human sound-alikes and impersonators would also be in violation and things become a huge mess.

A key distinction here is that a human brain is not a work, and in that sense, a human brain learning things is not a derivative work.

[–] ChemicalRascal@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Off topic, but: Hmm. Weird, I can't read comments in this community anymore when using the kbin light theme. That's... new.

[–] ChemicalRascal@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

You're absolutely right. Heliocentrism and geocentrism aren't "questions of reference frame", they're cosmological models.

Nobody is using a geocentric model when they launch satellites, as any geocentric model that works with our existing observations of the universe ultimately does not have a functional understanding of gravity. And it will be remarkably difficult to keep a satellite in orbit if you disagree with the universe about how gravity works.

[–] ChemicalRascal@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago

Urgh. He's seriously trying make a comeback after Godus? You'd think he'd have thrown the towel in and retired.

[–] ChemicalRascal@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

She really struggles to maintain basic decorum, doesn't she? I can't understand what her constituents see in her.

[–] ChemicalRascal@kbin.social 23 points 2 years ago (5 children)

We have the foreknowledge of seeing EEE happen with XMPP/Google Chat, now. We can fight back against EEE against ActivityPub as it actually happens, with instances defederating with Meta and so on, when they start actually taking those negative actions. It's gonna be fine.

[–] ChemicalRascal@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago

You can't. You're trying to do something on kbin.social (or another kbin instance), which isn't the instance you're on.

If you want to use kbin, you'll need to, well, use kbin. The instances talk to each other, but you don't have an account on one just from having an account on the other.

[–] ChemicalRascal@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

That's using your Google account, with Google's OAuth, to get into an Outlook account — which is still weird and confusing, and IMO something Microsoft shouldn't have done because it'll confuse people, but hey.

[–] ChemicalRascal@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Exactly this. If Reddit wasn't pulling in enough revenue to have value, as a business, it would have collapsed years ago.

[–] ChemicalRascal@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

As per OP's edits, yes.

[–] ChemicalRascal@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

No, it's specifically "kbinbot", case insensitive. Even "botkbin" gets through just fine.

view more: ‹ prev next ›