Off topic, but: Hmm. Weird, I can't read comments in this community anymore when using the kbin light theme. That's... new.
ChemicalRascal
You're absolutely right. Heliocentrism and geocentrism aren't "questions of reference frame", they're cosmological models.
Nobody is using a geocentric model when they launch satellites, as any geocentric model that works with our existing observations of the universe ultimately does not have a functional understanding of gravity. And it will be remarkably difficult to keep a satellite in orbit if you disagree with the universe about how gravity works.
Urgh. He's seriously trying make a comeback after Godus? You'd think he'd have thrown the towel in and retired.
She really struggles to maintain basic decorum, doesn't she? I can't understand what her constituents see in her.
We have the foreknowledge of seeing EEE happen with XMPP/Google Chat, now. We can fight back against EEE against ActivityPub as it actually happens, with instances defederating with Meta and so on, when they start actually taking those negative actions. It's gonna be fine.
You can't. You're trying to do something on kbin.social (or another kbin instance), which isn't the instance you're on.
If you want to use kbin, you'll need to, well, use kbin. The instances talk to each other, but you don't have an account on one just from having an account on the other.
That's using your Google account, with Google's OAuth, to get into an Outlook account — which is still weird and confusing, and IMO something Microsoft shouldn't have done because it'll confuse people, but hey.
rip rif
Exactly this. If Reddit wasn't pulling in enough revenue to have value, as a business, it would have collapsed years ago.
As per OP's edits, yes.
No, it's specifically "kbinbot", case insensitive. Even "botkbin" gets through just fine.
That's a HUGE assumption you've made, and certainly not something that has been tested in court, let alone found to be true.
In the context of existing legal precedent, there's an argument to be made that the resulting model is itself a derivative work of the copyright-protected works, even if it does not literally contain an identifiable copy, as it is a derivative of the work in the common meaning of the term.
A key distinction here is that a human brain is not a work, and in that sense, a human brain learning things is not a derivative work.